Dangerous Blef Kremlin: What are the risks of Lavrov's new statements about war for Ukraine
Starting from this, the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, the armistice, was a path to nowhere. Meanwhile, Lavrov commented on the eve of the propaganda program "60 minutes". "It is quite clear to all non -engaged observers that the conflict can be resolved solely in the context of agreements on reliable security and stability in Europe, which would take into account the interests of Russia and the legitimate interests of all other countries," - said the Chief Russian Diplomat.
In addition, he noted that with the acquisition of powers by the administration of the newly elected US President Donald Trump, the negotiation process to establish peace will not necessarily begin. "It will not be inevitable," Lavrov emphasized, immediately adding that Putin allegedly never refused to negotiate, but "we must see the serious suggestions that come to us.
" "We need reliable, legally binding agreements aimed at eliminating the main causes of conflict, including common security in Europe, NATO's expansion, a recent EU decision to just lie under the block, and essentially eliminate all differences between these organizations, And, of course, the rights of people living in the territories and expressed for reunification with Russia, " - said the head of Romanz.
At the same time, Lavrov has recognized that Ukraine's support in the United States has a "solid dual -partial consensus". Having stated that Lavrov tries to demonstrate Trump's attacks on Europe in every possible way, political scientist Maxim Jigun said in a conversation with focus: "A favorable ground for Russian planting is now created that it has accumulated a lot of problems with Europe.
Trump's statements, because for him, in his sense, he is a yoke, which is constantly helping, which must be financed without receiving nothing in return. , anti -European touch points. " As for the end of the war, the provision of "legal guarantees", etc. , the political scientist on this occasion states: "We are now watching the diplomatic correspondence battle between the Trump and Russian team. Trump.
And now Lavrov is unambiguously hinting that the Russians still need to ask for such negotiations. where each party wants to go from maximalist positions. " In general, according to Maxim Dzhigun, Russia has a story when their key speakers - Putin, Lavrov, Nebenza - say interdependent things. For example, the expert makes a recent "straight line", during which Putin said that he would not express the previous conditions for the start of peace talks, while Lavrov now states the opposite.
"It is in the voice of mutual theses that the content of public communications of the Russian Federation is. maneuvers, "the expert says. Answering the question of the truce, which Rosmz head called the way in nowhere, Maxim Jigun emphasized: "Lavrov, as they say, multiplied by zero the efforts of Orban, which recently made the theme of the truce as with a written bag.
And this While the task of the Hungarian premiere was to influence the event in the media sense, which, saying that Kyiv disrupts this track. will provide separate preferences. " The current Prime Minister of Hungary, sums up the political scientist, neither in the Russian Federation nor in the United States, actually perceived as a serious player, using as "a day-to-day messenger, who is" drained on the first or best occasion.
" Lavrov concerning NATO: "The danger is that Trump supports the idea of rejection of Ukraine to the North Atlantic Alliance and, as for me, at least in the years of Trump's presidency, we will not advance in this direction, although there was still hope that for Baiden We will get an invitation to NATO. And the laurel acting is an attempt to show that there is much in common between Putin and Trump in the vision of international security policy, more than it may seem at first glance.
And, unfortunately, in fact, in some matters. Trump's latest statements about Mexico, Panama, Canada and Greenland show that both the one and the one, so seek expansions, simply one by war and the other by the method of diplomatic pressure. " The United Ukraine Center Dmitry Levus is a clear evidence that Russia is not going to give up Putin's demands previously voiced.
So, on the contrary, she said that peace is possible in 2025 and Russia is ready to compromise, but attention, without retreating at the same time neither is it from its requirements. That is, as we can see, all Russian speakers, talking about the likelihood of a peace agreement in the coming year, appeal to the Putin Zabozhang, assuring that Moscow is not going to adjust them somehow, "the political scientist notes.
They testify to a certain expansion of the requirements of the Russian Federation: "If you analyze fresh quotes of Lavrov, it can be argued that it is a return to the position of January 2021, when in Moscow from early deaths repeated the mantra about the need to" take away "until the borders of 1997. On the other hand, as for me, in fact, we hear the expansion of these requirements from the Russian Federation can also indicate that Russia, perhaps, may want these negotiations.
That is, by making old-new demands and realizing that it will not push them in negotiations with the United States, Moscow simply expands the "Price-List" of bidding, trying, in my opinion, very awkward Trump into a diplomatic trap. " Willingness to negotiate exclusively with the United States, and in the face of Lavrov is looking for ways to coercion to Washington, not Moscow, acting as the initiator of peaceful negotiations. It is Putin who wants to sit down as soon as possible at this context.
, in protest on the decision of NATO to start the bombing of Yugoslavia. 'as saying, well. Currently, the political scientist states, the situation is very similar: Russia is far in the best position, but "continues to bluff every time", playing with fire and not being able to get rid of the imperial virus.