The new social network Threads did not offer anything new. And here the assembly on the Armed Forces slowed down

Is it worth paying attention to the new child Zuckerberg? Meta Mark Zuckerberg launched a new social network on July 6, the third for the company (after Facebook and Instagram). Threads ("threads" literally or "chains") is presented as a competitor Twitter, and Ilon Musk is no longer delayed: his lawyer threatens to sue Meta for the lure of employees and the use of intellectual property.

Yes, Twitter declines after acquiring a mask: the moderation teams will be released, then the service falls, then Ukrainians refuse Twitter because of pro -Russian statements of the mask. But is there another social network, such as others? Earlier, social networks were occupied by some unoccupied niches. Like Instagram-Facebook bought it when he was already a well-known social network for posting photos. Threads is not special.

In addition, Twitter has appeared in Twitter and so there were several competitors - Mastodon and Bluesky, who have been searched by Internet until recently. Threads has a good screen saver on a desktop lending (there is no version for PC yet) and a familiar interface - not for nothing it was created in the empire of the social networks of Zuckerberg. But the ribbon looks very chaotic.

Instagram users, along with their empty profiles, were moved into the "chains", and facebook pages with videos with animals or "Kraft" and lovers of humor were moved there. It is hardly a useful thing to spend your time on scroll here. Another negative side - Twitter, due to the almost complete lack of censorship, became a place where Ukrainians and Ukrainians raise money to help the Armed Forces.