"Didn't shake the boat and can go into politics after the war," - expert on the resignation of Zaluzhny (video)

The resignation at his own request signals that Valery Zaluzhny understands the danger of scandal during the war. He understood Zelensky, who suggested that the former commander -in -chief stay in the system of military struggle against the occupier, says Candidate of Political Science Alexei Buryachenko. The decision on the resignation of Valery Zaluzhny from the post of commander -in -chief of the Armed Forces was mutual, and the statement was written at will.

This testifies to the result of a normal, male, even partner conversation between Zaluzhny and Vladimir Zelensky. Alexei Buryachenko, executive director of the International Association of Small Communities, told this in an interview with Focus. According to him, in his appeal for personnel permutations there is a huge respect for Zaluzhny from Zelensky. There is no non -constructive criticism.

"Zelensky suggested that the Zaluzhny stay in the defense system of our country, providing a list of possible positions," Buryachenko emphasizes. "They can be thanked for both moderation and not playing internal politicians or Russia by unwinding a scandal. " According to the expert, a very important aspect is that Zaluzhny wrote a statement of his own request and is an indicator that he is not going to "shake the boat".

After the war, like anyone who wants from Ukrainian citizens, he can take care of the political struggle, if he wants, says Buryachenko, but now Zaluzhny realizes that confrontation will harm not so much Zelensky as the country as a whole. Zaluzhny had many problems at the front and in the rear, but the main thing that he himself recognized them in his articles, notes the expert.

However, you should not forget, says Buryachenko that it was at Umerov that a real recruitment began to the ranks of the Armed Forces, which finally activated the rotational process in the Ukrainian army. "And there were many hints from Western partners that they do not see the plan and strategy of war on the part of the General Staff of the Armed Forces," the expert notes. "The such resignation decision is quite clear.