USD
41.73 UAH ▲0.22%
EUR
49.12 UAH ▲0.69%
GBP
56.95 UAH ▼0.44%
PLN
11.57 UAH ▲0.5%
CZK
1.99 UAH ▲1.11%
The SBU does not indicate the name and name of the detainee, but the media write...

During the war rich at over $ 1 million: the Chief Psychiatrist of the Armed Forces (Photo) was detained

The SBU does not indicate the name and name of the detainee, but the media write about Oleg friends. Earlier he was already "caught" on a bribe and removed from the position of chief of the clinic. The person is also known for his statements towards ATO participants. Employees of the Security Service of Ukraine detained the Chief Psychiatric of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, who is the deputy chairman of the Central VLK and resolves the issue of the suitability of the military before the service.

During the war, he got rich in more than $ 1 million, the SBU reported. Law enforcement officers added that the husband did not reflect the relevant property in his declaration, making him on his wife, daughter, sons and other persons. During 2022-2024, the suspect purchased: investigators conducted searches during which funds were found in the amount of $ 152,000 and 34 thousand euros.

He is currently being prepared about suspicion of illegal enrichment (Articles 365-5 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) and in the declaration of false information (Article 366-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), and the issue of election of a preventive measure and seizure of assets of the official is being resolved. He faces up to 10 years in prison. Law enforcement officers do not tell the surname and name of the psychiatrist. However, according to the media, it is about Oleg friends.

It should be noted that in 2017, the SBU detained on the bribe of one of the clinics of the Chief Military Medical Hospital of the Ministry of Defense, who "systematically smashed money from servicemen for declaring them unsuitable for further service. " The man was detained "on the hot" in the office after transferring 52 thousand hryvnias of another bribe. He was declared suspicion under Part 3 of Art.

368 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine - acceptance of a proposal, promise or receipt of undue benefit by an official. Then the media noted that it was about Oleg friends. However, it is not known what the case ended in court, because, according to the prosecutor's office, the materials have been there for a long time.

Later, on the roundtable of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Health, friends stated that "combatants after returning to a peaceful life can become a threat to both their own families and the whole society. " According to him, 98% of people need qualified support and assistance as a result of combat stress factors. In addition, in September 2017, one of the demobilized ATO participants, Martin Brest, published a post on Facebook on the statement of the hospital chief.

There it was stated that Oleg Druz called ATO participants a potential threat to society. "MOV Chief Psychiatrist, Chief of Psychiatry Klinina Colonel Oleg Vasilyevich today at the" Committee on Health Care "stated (read from his own presentation) that 93% of ATO participants are a potential threat to society (" Landed enemy "). In words, 93% of us are problematic, and we need to be treated, "he wrote. This caused indignation on social networks.

The then Defense Minister made a decision to dismiss the Chief of Psychiatry of the National Military Medical Center "Chief Military Clinical Hospital" Oleg Friends in connection with unsatisfactory performance of official duties and awarded official investigation. After the media, with reference to volunteers, they reported that the detached colonel, the chief psychiatrist of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, continued to perform the duties of the Chief of Psychiatry Clinic and go to work.

We will remind, on January 20 it became known about the detention of the eccount of the 155th brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Anna of Kiev. Law enforcement officers noted that during 2024, the colonel had information about the HSC in his brigade and constantly received such reports from the command staff of the military unit, but did not inform the bodies of pre -trial investigation into the facts revealed.