NATO countries are not ready for war. Why from Ukraine cannot be required for a quick alliance compliance

The requirements of the event to Ukraine are the task of rapid compliance with NATO standards. But, as publicist Anton Shvets notes, even in the leading countries of the Alliance as Germany, this is the serious problems of NATO's standards in the context of the US proposal for urgent reforms. Purely to understand that standards are not a panacea. Here, German Foreign Ministry head Annalen Berbb said that the part of the assistance provided by Germany was not ammunition.

That is, she did not work at least fully. That is why there is a delay in the transfer of Taurus missiles "Taurus", because the Germans need to find out what the condition of these missiles in them. See what the matter is. Okay, "Leopards 1" were transferred from storage, somewhere there the technician in the third shift about… scored, something did not stroke, did not check, the car was not ammunition. Happens. But Taurus missiles stand up for the Bundeswehr right now.

If the equipment is in service, it can not be ammunition. Not, well, some number can, but the GSC should understand exactly what part of the missiles in combat duty, what part of the warehouses and in what condition they are, which is on the maintenance, which has failed, and so on. Not at the moment, but as of the past week should be known. But the Germans do not know about their missiles.

Since the taurus nomenclature is large enough, now they are trying to understand how much and what rockets they work in, and how many of those missiles they can give us. And they need time. Considerable. That is, despite all the standards, the General Staff of the Bundeswehr did not know the state of his rocket weapons. Maybe he never knew until we asked. The most cunning reader here will say: "Well, Anton, well, it's not true, just Annalena manipulates not to give us rockets.

It's just a diplomatic move. " Unfortunately, not lies. First, it is not only Leo1. There are other cases that I will write about after the war, and they cannot be explained by sabotage. At least with sabotage with respect to us. Because such a situation in the Bundesver was before our war. But OK, I know about it, there is no public. Then second. No diplomacy or manipulation can be explained, for example, by a scandal from the "Puma".

As it turned out before the war, a fully booked German "cougar" cannot be transported by any German transport aircraft. Partially armored in class A "cougar" can only get into A400m. One. That is, three A400m can bring three "cougars", and another A400m is needed to deliver a class C for three cars that will have to be installed in place.

It is said that it is installed quickly, but it means that no landing operation with "PUMs is impossible without a captured huge airport with a suitable farm with cranes, and other fig. About the connection between MIC and GSC, which is required in US reform proposals. The Puma APC is one of the most expensive in the world in its class. German A400m is a European aircraft. Germany is a major explorator (perhaps the only one). As yes).

It happened that the German MIC, who made an APC on the task of the German Momph according to the plans of the German HS, created a car that would not fit into the European aircraft in the main variant - I am h. Germany. Our war with the "Pumas" a new scandal happened. During training it became clear that all of the 18 "Pum" that used to test, not ammunition. Wiring. No one would know about it.

We asked not "cougars", we asked for "Marders", but it turned out that if we give old "Marders", then there is nothing to fight. Only when they started checking did it become clear that it did not work. Germany has been a NATO member since 1955. Standards there, say, are some. They are performed, no one will say that the Germans are not a meticulous nation. And yet. The first check shows that despite all the standards - the Bundesver, the NATO Army, not ammunition. What with rockets - hz.

From the APC - hz. This has not yet been checked. The march to Moscow, which made Prigogine from Rostov, would not be able to execute the Bundesver. The Udar could, and the Bundesver would not be able to, and the standards would not be saved. Even in the captured growth of the week, it would be that it could not be stupid. I am not here to the fact that the standards are not needed. Are needed. But they are difficult to implement and keep them. It's just difficult because it's hard work.

It is not easy to make a horizontal relationship between MIC and MO, it is not easy. Germany could not. Stupidly…, the APC does not get into the plane. Your APC in your plane. And if it would have come, it would be that it did not work. Logistics in a fighting country is a separate problem.

During a campaign in Iraq, the United States had to break, for example, all the logistics of supplying spare parts for "apachers" (Edge-in Iraq, the desert, the wear of the parts of the screw from the sand appeared to be non-normative, who could expect it, well). I had to create new logistics and send from the plant to the field airfields. Not by NATO standards, because they were not stupid. We need to go a difficult way.