Molfar attacks: As Ukraine's information space was filled by astrologers and numerologists
And it is on a channel, where they often discuss difficult, sometimes purely technical topics, where decent educated speakers do not neglect. Even it is scary to imagine how popular "Vedic astrologers" and other molfars on channels with a simpler face. I very much hope that this Vedic broadcast of Romanenko was paid because to trust the figures of the information field with a mystical outlook - not to respect themselves.
However, even for the money to let such "goals" into the studio-a minus in karma, especially if you are not short and have a wonderful understanding that nothing but a purga about the Kali-Yuga era, this speaker is not able to carry this speaker. If you already want to "hayp" for the sake of growth of the audience, just more often mumble on the air - and the people will certainly pull up.
But God with Him, with Romanenko! The dominance of astrologers, Vedic experts, numerologists and other easels is noted everywhere. Especially this is subject to journalists. It is likely that psychological tension from a long war and regular shelling of a "peacekeeper", anxiety for loved ones is signed.
Today, the most popular question is on the air, regardless of the topic and intellectual level of the interlocutor: "When will the war end"? And everyone is well aware that no one is able to answer, but they do not get tired. And the belly here is in a privileged position: they do not need to prove anything, refer to some secret sources in special services and higher echelons: simply to speak nonsense with a reasonable appearance, noting connections with the higher mind and the divine beginning.
But perhaps the most astral astrologers are a special variety of "experts", "political scientists" and "analysts". It is very easy to recognize them. They do not burden themselves even to some divine connection. They refer solely to themselves. Whatever happens, they are ready to answer everything: "I said!" Let's not mention the inhabitant of Portnikov or "Portnikov on the minimum", which is giggling with a reasonable appearance - Leonid Shvets.
Here is an economic Molfar Alexei Kushch, which is gaining popularity. This loves economic terminology, especially the word "cluster" and constantly refers to its own publications on any topics that it runs at the speed of teletype. There is such a channel "UkrLife with Lyudmila Neyreya". The mistress of the channel is indifferent to the heralds of all varieties. Naturally, she did not overlook the bush.
Nemyr, as in the vast majority of Ukrainian interviewees, has a professional: they seem to be preparing for broadcasts, but it seems that they do not understand in the topic of discussion, or never thought about it. Therefore, their method is simple as a parsley: on the table-a sheet with 3-5 prepared questions. They see their mission in one thing: invite a guest and be sure to ask these five questions.
Point! Whatever nonsense is carrying the speaker, the journalist will not reset it, will not deny it, it will not give counter -arguments. The main thing is to clog the air with an empty chatter.
If Lyudmila Nemyria was interested in the bush person and the ideas he carries (and his ideas - steadily counterliberal), she after the next exclamation of the guest "I said!" It would be supposed to ask: but you predicted the rapid political death of Liberast Milei, which took place on a liberal basis to rebuild the Argentina economy, but today it is obvious today: Milea's plan is justified, its popularity in the country is not falling since the election, contrary to revolutionary reforms , the National Value did not collapse, etc.
, etc. . . . If such a question was risen - the looseness of the speech of Molfar bush would be waved by a hand. But no: the one with a smart look habitually replaced my "I said!" - And he was like that. However, everything that is happening in the Ukrainian media ("Telearaphone" will not be mentioned) is not so much journalists as listeners, readers and viewers who are appetizing all this information spam. The author expresses a personal opinion that may not coincide with the editorial position.