Danger of smoke: Why Russia does not recognize explosions at Saki Air Base in Ukrainian diversion

Ukraine's attempt to release the Crimea in the military means is the inevitability of the direct conflict of the Russian Federation and NATO, Putin said. Here, please - "Saky". And they do not take after the explosions at the military airfield in the Crimean Novofeedorovka, Russian media published a number of versions about the reasons for what happened. But none of these versions suggested that Ukrainian participates in the event. It would seem that everything should be the other way around.

In Moscow, they should strive to accuse Ukraine of shelling or diversions in Crimea and thus prove the "aggressiveness" of a state in which Russian troops carry out a "special operation". On the eve of this attack, Russian President Vladimir Putin argued that the main danger of Ukrainian accession to NATO is that Ukraine is claiming Russian Crimea. And if, they say, he wants to release him military means, then in this case the conflict of Russia and NATO is simply inevitable.

But at the same time, the Russian president did not cite any evidence of Ukraine's readiness to release Crimea through military force. And here, please - evidence in the saki. Nate, take. And they do not take. They have not been taken, although they have been sought by Ukrainian "saboteurs" for years, even the filmmaker Oleg Sentsov or journalists of Nicholas Semen and Vladislav Esipenko have been accused of unfulfilled crimes. They falsified the accusations, passed false judgments.

And when real explosions occurred, they began to explain the incident with carelessness. Negligence, not a Ukrainian sabotage, after which it would be possible to threaten the neighboring state or to be arrested for a "terrorist act". Why? And, perhaps, because it is real explosions, not a staging for the sake of another demonstration process. Special services are responsible for real explosions.

So they couldn't cope? Therefore, there is no reliable air defense system above Crimea - if it is shelling. Or there are no effective special services - if it is a diversion. So, there is no "sacral" security of Crimea? Who is sure that you want to recognize? After all, such a confession will have to be answered not to the television audience, but to the "viewer # 1", which is unlikely to like that Russian security forces cannot protect the captured territory.

And if the "main viewer" is aware of reality, then do you think he wants to demonstrate this understanding? So it turns out that if Russian propagandists, who initially have not yet received "Temnik", feverishly named the explosions at the airfield "Seat", then the version of "negligence" still displaced all other options for explaining what happened. They were not smoked - and that's it. Fire safety must be observed.

It remains only to point out that if the Soviet special services would be as "effective" as their successors in Lubyanka, at the airfield under the sacs could hardly land the US President Franklin Roosevelt, Prime Minister Winton Churchill and The head of the Radnarkom Stalin. And the famous Yalta conference would not have taken place. However, the Yalta World order has long been destroyed by the actions of Russian President Vladimir Putin.