Ukrainian "knife" or Russian "relict": which dynamic protection is more efficient (video)
The representative of the scientific and production enterprise "Energy 2000" Nikolai Salamakh in an interview for "Military" told which dynamic protection is better: "knife", "contact" or "relict". Dynamic protection is a type of reservation of military equipment. If you reduce the technical parts as much as possible, special plates are installed in the containers, which explode when in contact with the projectile.
In this way, the explosive wave should absorb the efficiency of the impact, in particular the cumulative stream, which literally burns the reservation. However, it is worth noting that there is non -clipping dynamic protection and electrical protection. Mykola Salamakha spoke about the difference between explosive dynamic protection "knife" of Ukrainian development, "contact-1" and "contact-5" of Soviet/Russian and "relict" of Russian development.
According to Salamakh, the Ukrainian "knife" is guaranteed to remove up to 70% of the capacity of the cumulative jet. "Contact-1"-removes up to 20%, "Contact-5"-up to 50%. The Russian "relict" is not in fact a new development, according to the Russian Federation. This type of DZ differs in another way to "contact-5". In terms of efficiency, it is similar to the Ukrainian "knife" - about 70% of the capacity of the cumulative jet.
But if you use the "knife" in the Duplet design, then no "contact" and "relict" will be compared. The expert also called data for armor-piercing shells, contact-1 will be ineffective, contact-5-15-20%, "than"-up to 50%. Photos of trials are open. According to Solomakh, it is because of the low efficiency of "Contact-1" or even "Contact-5" can hang logs or sacks with sands, because tankers understand the threat from even Soviet ammunition on the type "mango" or "mango-m".