Four tasks for Syrsky: Will the new head change the course of war

The Commander -in -Chief of the Armed Forces Alexander Sirsky set several tasks. In particular, look at last year's tactics that did not produce results and prevent stagnation on the front line. The focus asked the experts to evaluate whether the head would follow the instructions from above. After General Valery Zaluzhny's resignation, the President's office explained what the decision was conditioned.

Among the key reasons, Advisor Mikhail Podolyak named: probably, these tasks are set before the new commander -in -chief of the Armed Forces Alexander Sirsky. "When we say" avoid stagnation "is to go on the offensive. This task stands before the head. Well, if he can plan the offensive actions, relying on the forces and means we now have - it will be on the verge of biblical miracle", " -Alexei Hetman, a participant in the Russo-Ukrainian War, thinks in conversation with focus.

According to the interlocutor of the focus, military circles say that the replacement of the head in the midst of the ongoing military action is not the most successful course. "Personally, Colonel-General Alexander Syrsky has no claims. But the tasks set before him will not be fulfilled. Because there is no money in the army. If partners give us weapons, shells, we will be able to carry out additional mobilization, then we can plan the offensive Actions to stop stagnation. But let's be realists.

If this is not the case, how the head fulfills the task? I am scared for him, because political leadership can make him guilty if the situation does not improve, "the hetman continues. According to political expert Oleg Posternak, the main claim to General Zaluzhny from a military-political point of view was due to the fact that the active phase of war was not sent to the battle that were outside the foremost. "The western part of the press also writes about it.

Therefore, we will probably see a different approach to the acquisition of parts and use them on the battlefield. And although many already lifting it as if General Zaluzhny did not throw soldiers into battle because they were taking their lives , and Colonel-General Sirsky will not regret anyone. But this is a very simplified approach to understanding their figures, "the expert notes. According to Posternak, Sirsky will be more dependent on the President's office than Zaluzhny.

This was one of the reasons why the head was replaced. "This is not bad but not good. In a country with deep democratic traditions, alternative scenarios are better than authoritarian management. But perhaps at this stage of the war on exhaustion, there is no other way to retain the efficiency of the army, and the president is guided by these interests," the expert adds .

Political scientist Igor Reityrovich believes that there will be no fundamental approach that is expected in the President's office after the resignation of Zaluzhny. The new head will continue his course, but will be more loyal to power. "It is possible, of course, to carry out simply permutations for visibility. But fundamentally I do not think that something will change. Syrsky will continue to do what Zaluzhny did.

And all the words that the president voiced, that you need to change in the Armed Forces - this is perhaps the word into the word phrase from the article of Zaluzhny. What is the fundamentally new approach? " - Asks Reitrovich. We will remind, according to experts, the release of General Valery Zaluzhny can cause apathy and disappointment in society, which can lead to protests after the war.