Due to Nobel ambitions and statements about the war with Pakistan: Trump got into quarrel with the Indian prime minister - NYT

To spread: US President Donald Trump came under the "disgrace" of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was "losing patience" to the American leader every time. The reason, in particular, was Trump's loud statements that he was able to allegedly resolve the conflict between India and Pakistan. In fact, the conflict between India and Pakistan is much more complicated than Trump imagines, and his ambitions on the possible receipt of the Nobel Prize were finally angry with Nari Modi.

About it writes the newspaper The New Yok Times. On June 17, during a telephone conversation with the Indian Prime Minister, Trump decided to remind him of his contribution to resolving the issue of Indian-Pakistan conflict. He also decided to "hint" the Indian authorities that it should nominate it to receive the Nobel Prize, as it was already done in Pakistan.

This fashion was angry and stated that Donald Trump's interference was absolutely not involved in the settlement of a war that recently flared up between the countries. Donald Trump "waved" from the dishonest comments of Narendra Modi. But their dispute and refusal to put Trump to the Nobel Prize played a major role in the conflict between politicians.

The media notes that the dispute has flared up between politicians against the background of trade negotiations and duties that Donald Trump laid India. The consequences of these actions can encourage India to get closer to the Kremlin and Beijing, and the closest meeting should take place in China these days, as fashion should come here for a meeting with President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Trump surprised the Indian authorities when only a few weeks after a telephone conversation with fashion announced the taxation of imports from the country with 25 percent duties. He then introduced an additional 25 percent duties on the purchase of Russian oil. Some of the officials believe that this was done as "punishment for failure to fulfill obligations than by any coordinated efforts to reduce the trade deficit.