Russia will end in Crimea. Vitaliy Kapranov - About how Putin will overlook his hands and Russia will be moved at the New Yalta Conference
- A year ago, about the same dates, we talked to you about Crimea, and you said that Crimea is a place where all empires end, and the Russian Empire will end there, and the last president of Russia would commit suicide in Crimea, because annexation He drove himself into a trap. When is suicide already? Video of the day - I hope that the holiday, when he will finally put on his hands in the Crimea, will soon come.
And for those who doubt that all of Russia will end in Crimea, I will remind that the Soviet Union ended in Crimea - Mikhail Gorbachev, the first and last president of the Soviet Union, was arrested in the cottage in Foros. . Crimea is generally sacred, and this is evident from all historical data.
The Scythian state finished its existence when Russia seized the Crimean Khanate, after 70 years there was a Crimean war, and after the Crimean War, then the acting emperor actually committed suicide - he went out to a parade in winter without a overcoat in one uniform, cold and died of inflammation lungs, that is, he put his hands there. Historical data is not missing, and what is happening today is just an embodiment of sacred things.
Whatever laughter we have treated this issue, but Crimea comes out in history with a sacred point for Russia, in which it has died twice and, we hope, will now die for the third time. Everything goes according to plan. - Russia will cease to be a threat to Ukraine when it breaks down as an empire? - Undoubtedly. Only then. Whatever our planet is, and Russia and I do not fit on it. Even if you increase the earth twice, we will still not fit together there.
Do you know why? The fact is that in the national myth that Russia has built for itself, there is no place for us. Ask any of the greatest Russian from where the Russians come from, he will say-from Kiev. Ask where your language comes from, they will say - it is the language of church books that were in Kiev. They fully claim our past, and the existence of us - denies their existence. That's the main secret that Ukrainians are constantly called traitors. Ukrainians are traitors to them.
We thought for a long time - whom we betrayed, and everything is very simple. Ukrainians are the only material from which Russians can be made. The Russians do not actually exist as such, they do not have their own identity, but Russified Ukrainians are a great material for new citizens of the empire, and anyone who is Ukrainian - he refused to be Russian. A person who speaks Ukrainian has abandoned Russian identity, and therefore whom? So she is a traitor.
He can speak Kazakh, be a radical - he will never be called a traitor because he is Kazakh. Tartar will not be a traitor, and the Ukrainian will always be a traitor for the Russians, because their logic: if you speak Ukrainian, what do you hate Russian for so much? Once we were asked by journalists: "Here you publish Ukrainian books, what do you hate Russian?" Therefore, we will not fit on one planet, we will not fit on it. Someone has to disappear, and now we are fighting for it.
- But the question is not only in the language. A person can speak Ukrainian, but be Little. You have recently made a blog about what the little Russians differed from the Ukrainians. If it is translated into the present, who do you consider to be Little Russia today? - The conscious part of the Ukrainians has always been divided into two trends: independent and autonomists. One of the most striking examples of autonomists is Mikhail Drahomanov, Uncle Lesya Ukrainka.
He was an autonomist, but oddly enough, the Russian Empire was much more autonomists than independent, because it is clear with the independent - it stands on it, he is Bandera, Petliuriv, Mazepine. But these, which make turmoil in good little Russians, which are ready to become Russians, and they make sadness about some autonomous Ukraine there - these are actually the biggest enemies. Today I would share the question of language because it clearly indicates belonging to some information space.
The language on the Internet, in particular in YouTube, is a certificate that you belong to the Ukrainian space, to Ukraine virtual. And the question of your views is the following question. Today, in the virtual space, the Ukrainian language is the first sign of a Ukrainian. You will not all the time, talking in Russian, through the word to add Putin Hu*lo.
Here, if a person says, "we are in Ukraine, we are in Ukraine, we are from Ukraine" - how do you confirm that you are from Ukraine, except that you are talking from "we are from Ukraine"? This is a simple question. I will not say that I am from Ukraine - because I can see that I from Ukraine, it is heard that I am from Ukraine, I do not have to ask "Where are you from where you, uncle?". It is clear where, when they hear what language I speak. I am from Ukraine and a point.
- You have Arestovich on the cover of the Little Russians. It is for you in modern Ukraine the personification of Littleros? - Well, it does not exist at all, between us. He himself confessed that he was a fake. He had once interviewed, he said "I was fooling you, I am not really a patriot, I am not really talking into Ukrainian, I pretended, I fought you.
" Well, what to talk about a person who does not exist in nature, who is always faded and will say "Ah ha ha ha ha, I have gave you you"? It is not an object for conversation at all. The fact that we are on such characters is unfortunate, because it leads to very bad consequences, and our war today is a consequence of the fact that we have been behaved on such characters. - The war will take up many different characters who will then build the country.
- Oh, this is a sad conversation, but I want to give you optimism: if we were with you in such conditions that have stopped Russian aggression, then in the best conditions we will be able to cope with you. After all, we will not fool ourselves - that we stopped Russian aggression - it was actually an uprising with you against "Putin's eyes. " If in such conditions, as we were, we did not give up and stand, then in peaceful conditions somehow, I hope, we will handle, even if we are in the minority.
Nothing wrong, not for the first time. - As you think, for society, the invasion was such stress that it would be a little and rethinking, more demanding of power after the war, required the changes that it expects and which is given at such a big price? It will not work that after the war, when it will be necessary to restart the country, will, as they say lately - again "about*balls"? - Well, it will come out, for itself, because we always have an overestimated expectations with you.
We think there is a society that will understand something. There is no society if there will be a critical mass of active and patriotic people in each industry, in every settlement, territorial or professional environment, then society will follow us in one way or another. If we wait for Aunt Vali, who sits at the entrance, that she will start demanding something from power - I am afraid that we will not work with you.
Democracy is so cunning that it should have two components: the first component - a vote, which is allowed by all, the second component - control, which is allowed by those who want to control. You will not force people to control if they do not want to control. So our task is to build this second branch of democracy, which is in all countries and is called civil society. And it is formed today in battles.
If we, after dispersing the battlefield to our apartments, will realize that each of us must also form a group of like -minded people and take control of our territory - both in business, in public life, and territorially on the map of Ukraine, and biting and understanding that is here as in the war - either you or you . . . After the war, it will not work "And let them do there. " No, today we have our finger on the trigger.
Today we have passed the border when we were just afraid to take someone for lumps. - After the article, which Washington Post wrote about the preparation for the war and the plans that were among the Russians, claims to the authorities, in particular about the fact that they were not prepared for the invasion, as they could - that since October, no one could, even since October Without warning, dig the same trenches, make anti -tank missiles.
Many were offended by words that did not prevent what they thought that he would run half of the country and would not protect anyone. Is it a misunderstanding of your society? - This is an excuse, not the best. When a person justifies his foolish actions, he can even more fools. Not for nothing in the army was taught that you do not need to justify - you must say "guilty" and what you want to do to correct.
They did not serve in the army, so they do not understand simple truths - justifying, you are even more confused. They did not say nonsense because they really did - they did not believe that they would attack, they believed that "all the good children" and there was nothing to share. They did nothing, they did not say anything. And now they knit nonsense and set this to this active and armed part of society. Because it spat with you in our eyes, they called us cowards.
And that means they have something to hide. I will make an assumption, and I don't know what you will do with it. It seems to me that the situation was as follows: one of our, enough influential Taikom leadership agreed with Moscow, that they would take Donbas, and that everything would straw, we will shake hands and everything - "well, so tied. " And so this person or group of people were the main promoters to do nothing.
Therefore, new transition points were opened, so 19 areas were exchanged on the collision line. The script "Donbas we will lose and everything" was prepared. But Moscow is not able to keep promises, and she hit Kyiv. At least it is the only version that explains something. Well there is no other version. What are they completely stupid, the right from the left is not different? No. - The story with the Nazis and Bandera, which has long been blown by the Russians before starting this invasion.
I thought she was artificial - they just create such a myth and an excuse to justify this invasion. But in the same article Washington Post, their plans were described, they say that they did not even plan to capture the West of Ukraine because they believe that there are irreparable Bandera and it is generally meaningless. What says that they really believed that there were "Nazis", "Bandera", and it was no political technological myth. - Songs about Bandera many years.
I think that since Mazepa, only then they were called Mazepini, and now Bandera, and then Petliurivtsi . . . Myth is that Ukrainians and Russian are really "one people", but there are some "lousy sheep" that are beaten From the way. Greek Catholics, Jesuits, CIA, Swedes, Austrian General Staff, Masons-many people who knock down good Ukrainians from Puta. There are "these sheep sheep". There are few, but they spoil the whole herd.
That is, there is a Ukrainian people, and they scary communism, but there is a Bandera who spoils everything and Bandera. Here we will overcome them - then we will live. The same story today: the right sector was chosen to this role as the main enemy and Yarosh with him, then they looked that the right sector disappeared somewhere - glory to God arose Azov. Azov for them is generally trump ace. They also have symbolism - everything is suitable.
And they said, "There is Azov, it is bad, but we are Azov" Conchim " - and we will save the Ukrainians. " It is easier to think. Again, what is easier? To realize that Ukrainians are another people, that we have another system of values, another idea of good and evil, that we live differently and we want other - or to keep the thoughts that there are people whom the State Department has knocked down from the way? It's just much easier.
This version is completely invested in the imperial ideology, any other-that all Ukrainians dream of becoming Russians, but there is some name-Mazepa, Petliura, Bandera, Yaros, Biletsky, the collective name "Azov"-these 'The Ukrainians are not finally allowed to merge in ecstasy with Russia. It is the path of the slightest resistance, it is a path that you do not need to think, and most importantly - it is very complimentary about you.
We do not consider you that they are very far about us - they look at us from top to bottom. Why? What are the grounds for this? I do not know. Apparently, because they have 1/6 part of land - I think it decides everything. Well, they have oil. Apparently, there are some psychiatric studies here, but they have always had superiority and today. But to think about what perhaps does not need superiority - no! Why? You can just give your head and teach to love Russia forever.
- Frankly speaking, some in Ukraine looked from the bottom up, and this war, I hope, persuade them to stop finally and forever.
I want to ask just about the Azov you joined - do you know something more about the captives of the Azov, and as you think, will they now use a demonstrative judgment over them to say, "Here are Nazis, we found them, we punished them, the denacificationman successfully successfully Conducted ”? - First of all, I want to thank Azov with us that they saved us in the most difficult period of defense of Kiev. As for the prisoners, this is another we will deal with after the victory.
It is the fact that we were not ready for the war, exactly that we made all the transitions to the Crimea - and led to the surroundings of Mariupol. Our boys and girls, who are captured today, should dream of our leadership every night, because they are captured through them. If it were not for a blow from the south, Mariupol would not be surrounded and Azov would not be captured.
I will not understand now, could or could not be pulled out, but if they did not take Melitopol, they would not surround Mariupol, and Melitopol was taken, because the Russians left no one and nothing, in fact, not stopped from the Crimea. Therefore, of course, maneuvers begin: "Don't say anything about Azov, you interfere with the process of negotiations. " And quietly, quietly, quiet today we say anything, because we were told not to say. Azov history is completely immoral.
But no one expected anything from Moscow - we know that they are completely immoral, that they have neither honor, nor conscience, nor at all ideas about good and evil. They live in another world, humanoids from another planet, but there are questions and specific claims. Today, the Azovs will be used as weapons in the information war, which is a beautiful weapon. First, Putin can always say at any time: “We have destroyed the Azov-so we won the war. Denazification? Here is a denacification.
In Mariupol a cage. You see, they sit there. This is the Nuremberg process. We are denialify Ukraine. Now we will condemn them and everything, you can shake our hands and believe that we have won. " Therefore, Azov is a separate article for a separate investigation that after our victory should pass, and we must draw conclusions in order not to happen again.
The point is not even to understand, it is not to take revenge - the fact that the next power, which will go under the populist slogans "each of us President" - so that this power understands that it will be painful for such. And here she must be punished so that the next power is not played in such games. - Who punishes the winners. - Well, people, we are with you. This is our victory. This war is our uprising with you, it is our victory with you, we have won, not they [power].
We need to understand their [power] role, so that the following games are not played in such games so that they listen to us before. - more about the Nazis. As it turned out, real Nazis are Russians. Is it necessary after the war, after our victory, to deniberify them and how to do it? - I will be afraid that we do not have enough strength with you. I think that Russia's denacification should be a headache in Europe, because how much can be behind our back.
They are worried there for two degrees in the house, they do not become lower, and we die here. We understand that we are actually covering them with breasts. And the more Russia declares "we dies in the battles, that the Japanese to Angia was my family" - the better, the more it should come to Europe. Well, at least sit down and divide Russia as Stalin with Roosevelt and Churchill, only a macron with a shower somewhere in Yalta.
To arrange a conference-Biden, Macron, Scholtz-and eventually divide Russia, but without our participation. I will be afraid that we will have a lot of things, and we will not. Let us put Russia's denacification on the shoulders of the Allies. We are ready to hand over the palace in Yalta for this - take, arrange a Yalta conference, share Russia, provide denacification, provide demilitarization, and we will do what we will rebuild Ukraine, because we have work - do and do.
- That's acting to "do" and what we would have to finish. What would you wish the Ukrainians now? — Я би хотів звернутись до українців — ви навіть не уявляєте, які ви круті.
Шановні друзі, ми сьогодні з вами довели самі собі, що ми неймовірно круті, і я передусім хотів би нам з вами побажати от цієї самоповаги, щоб ми не розглядали це як епізод.
Ми повинні ставитись до світу з цієї точки зору, ми повинні вимагати від інших, по великому рахунку, саме тому, що ми круті. І наша самоповага повинна бути сьогодні постійною.
Тоді ми будемо поважати себе, тоді ми будемо поважати країну і тоді ми будемо жити щасливо, як переможці. Я від щирого серця бажаю нам всім, щоб ми навчились поважати себе і розуміти свій масштаб і своє значення в світовій історії. Час наших «І ми, Химко, люди!» минув.
На нас з вами Господь Бог поклав відповідальність за світову історію, і це не перебільшення. Пишайтесь, що ви українці, живіть як супергерої. Супергерої — добрі, супергерої — щедрі, супергерої — могутні і супергерої — вимогливі, вони не дають собі гадити на голову.