Technology

"Forced to tremble with fear": the officer of the Armed Forces compared the strikes of long -range drones of Ukraine and the Russian Federation

To spread: Ukraine and Russia use different tactics of long -range drones and fight against them. According to the Armed Forces officer Yuri Kasyanov, the forces of defense should use other drones and do not bet on the interceptors. Ukraine uses too large and noticeable drones for blows to Russia, unable to overcome Moscow's air defense. Ukrainian military Yuri Kasyanov compared the use of Ukrainian UAV "February" and Russian "Shahaneda" on its Telegram.

Recently, eyewitnesses were shot on the "February" camera in the sky near the Russian city of Sochi. The military pointed out that the flying drone is very low, using a radio meter or a laser altimeter. The mobile groups of air defense of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation do not have time to aim and hit, because at a low height the drone quickly leaves the fire zone.

If the group finds itself directly on the flight route, it may well knock down "February", but it took the radars to find the goal in advance, and it was time to go for interception. There is a risk that UAVs will fall directly on the aircraft crew. "February" is specially launched low to complicate detection. Radar stations notice goals only in the area of direct visibility, and its waves are blocked by houses, trees, hills, so the UAV behind them remains unnoticed.

In addition, at low height, truthful satellite navigation signals are more common so that UAV can adjust the route. Large drones overcome a large part of the route with the inertial navigation system, but at a distance of hundreds of kilometers thus cannot be accurately hit for targets. That is why you need to catch satellite signals from time to time and adjust the direction.

Drone flights at low altitudes also reduce the risks of anti-aircraft missiles, because anti-aircraft missile complexes are either unable to detect a target that hides from radars in relief irregularities in time, or cannot start a rocket for various reasons-too low a flight height of a racker, a rocket-shaped. radio channel. Russia makes no sense to use drones-interceptors, because it is ineffective.

You need to have time to start the drone, catch up with "February", not lose the connection, and hit. It is quite difficult for operators to see an enemy UAV that flies over a large city, because thermal imagers or infrared chambers dazzle light and heat.

"Undoubtedly, the enemy knocks our Ukrainian drones-Kamikadze where the air defense system is very dense, where many radars and SDKs, especially such as" shell-smd-e ", designed specifically for the fight against drones-new rockets against drones (as much as 48 pieces), a new radar.

The reaction to the threat - that is, as soon as it finds the target, automatically launches anti -aircraft missile, and then "February" cannot fly, as in the video - that is why our drones are rarely coming to Moscow or Peter - there is a very dense air defense. The officer claims that they will only be able to fly to Moscow and St. Petersburg, only less noticeable, radio transparent and quiet drones.

Ukraine needs to make small aircraft using stealth technologies, smaller motors, without carbon and almost without metal, with a small combat part. Only such drones managed to reach the center of Moscow in the last year. If you make an invisible UAV, capable of carrying 100 kg of explosives, they will cost a lot. There is no benefit from the large battle part, if you cannot accurately impress the target when satellites and mobile Internet are suppressed.

"Inexpensive, imperceptible drones that fly to Moscow and Peter every night, and securely closed the airports, forcing it to tremble with fear and ordinary inhabitants of swamp To overcome the Medical and Peter's aircraft.

The Russians have for a long time launch "Shahda" at altitudes of more than a kilometer, where they cannot be obtained by mobile air defense groups with machine guns and automatic rifles, and anti -aircraft missiles in the Armed Forces are so small that they are not spent on drones, because they will end very quickly. Good efficiency is shown by screws that fly in the path of UAV. Ukrainian attaches drones mainly by machine guns, and in Russian-the "air-air-air" missiles, which they have many.

At the high height of "Shahda" can be knocked down with drones-interceptors, in this way hundreds of enemy drones have already been knocked down, but their effectiveness is still small. The reason for the lack of operators, radars for guidance, constant suppression of GPS systems. As a result, the existing crews simply do not know where to go for interception.

According to the author, it is not necessary to suppress the satellite connection throughout Ukraine, because it is more harmful to the work of air defense than "Shahhedam". In such a conditions, in such circumstances can adjust the route and find goals, the Russians sometimes install video cameras and modems to get images and control a drone through a mobile Internet. Ukrainian engineers do so, so in the Russian Federation they turn off the connection during drones.

Shakhaned, however, simply descend below to catch satellite signals, and then become vulnerable to small arms. "Soon all the" chessi "will wear the onboard stations of the IP, learn to perform air maneuvers, and with the transition to jet engines, all our sprayed history with drones-interceptors will go to the dump of history, crazy money will be spent in vain, and a reliable outlet. Earlier it was written that the modified drones of the An-196 "February" were struck by Sochi Airport in Adler.