Who will decide the fate of Ukraine: the main myths about war and peace after Trump's victory
The plan is a realistic proposal that largely suits the main players who in our case are: USA, China, Russia, Ukraine (the order for the impact on the situation). And if the first proposal does not work, then the second, the third and so on. President Trump himself is not very prone to plans, he is more intuitive, who is working on a feeling.
Therefore, Trump must first undergo an inauguration, form a team, give an order to form a plan on the basis of consultations that are actively happening and then approved. It all takes time. And all that occurs in the media and in the statements of different persons, fakes, political technological accusations and provocations in order to influence the situation, including the struggle for proximity to the newly elected US President.
The second myth is the thesis that since the war continues in the territory of Ukraine, Ukraine must decide the conditions on which the fighting can be stopped. After the statement of President V. Zelensky, this has already made our Foreign Ministry. It sounds convincing, but in fact everything is the opposite. The pragmatic world to cynicism: if the war goes in our territory, it means that we are unable to expel the aggressor from the occupied territories.
And so the issues of war and peace will be considered by those who are so strong that they do not allow war in the territory of our own countries. First of all, the US and China. In order not to agree on Ukraine without Ukraine, it is necessary to have other, more convincing arguments than the vivid phrase of the speech. In particular, another situation on the front where the non -imperia continues to advance.