The killed Russians became three times more. What are the data on the losses of the Russian Federation in Ukraine
About 700 more, where there are any different readings. I emphasize: these are only those who were officially recognized as destroyed or publicly buried in Russia itself. That is, these are very incomplete figures that do not allow quantitative conclusions (only assumptions, extrapolation, because the real loss of the Russian Federation is at times higher), but quite representative for qualitative assessments and detection of trends. What is interesting.
At the end of 2023, the leaders in absolute numbers are as follows: at the end of 2022 the figures were as follows: the first year was a greater extent to reflect the losses of the professional army and mercenaries. Many killed from regions where the army is perceived as a social elevator (eg, Dagestan) and where the places of dislocation of military units (Buryatia, Transbaikal) are concentrated.
By the end of last year, September mobilization had already begun to adjust these figures, but not critical. The second year of the war is the loss of the Wagner (because of which the anomalous number of buried in the Krasnodar region) and voluntary-forced mobilization. The quantitative proportion of "the greater the population of the region is more killed" (except Moscow and St. Petersburg) begins to build.
The total number of losses of the Russian Federation by the end of December 2023 compared to the same date of 2022 increased 3. 87 times. So far, only the calendar year can be compared, the year to the year will be in two months. But it is already evident that in the 10 months of the first year of the war, the Kremlin officially drove more than 10 thousand soldiers to the grave, then for the second - almost 30 thousand. I emphasize - these are those who can be publicly recorded in Russia.
It is also evident that there are regions with a special approach. For example, Dagestan, who was almost last year in 1st place in terms of losses, by the end of 2023 dropped to 15th place (the 10th region in terms of population in the Russian Federation). Federal and regional authorities feel the limits of the permissible and are afraid to cause dissatisfaction. How the negative can splash - everyone was seen in the example of the capture of the airport.
Bashkortostan and Tatarstan have almost the same population, but the losses in Bashkirria are 30% higher than in Tatarstan. This is the result of the restless perseverance of the local Fuhrer - Radia Habirov, who tries to listen to Moscow, facilitating mobilization, creating regional units and more. In Ingushetia (where the Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Yunus-Beck Evkurov) the total number of losses increased by only 30%per year. In Tivi (where shoes) - 3. 65 times.
In the Sverdlovsk region - an increase of 4. 37 times. In the Krasnodar region - 4. 6 times. These are Wagner Zeks. Yakutia increases in losses 7. 7 times. This is mobilization. Do you remember the rollers with joyful Yakut wires into the army? These are the joyful Yakuti now sit in this figure. In general, the structure of losses can be seen which the authorities of the regions are active in the war and which do not demonstrate special enthusiasm. All this is material for the future tribunal.
The picture is as follows: the lowest relative losses in Moscow (less than 1 by 10 thousand), St. Petersburg (2. 8 per 10 thousand) and Moscow region (3. 6 per 10 thousand). One Muscovite is about 50 times more valuable than a resident of Tiva. In general, it must be acknowledged that, with the exception of several regions, the number of losses in absolute ones, which is not yet critical in relative numbers, even with extrapolation.
To understand where there are sensitive moments, you need to take additional signs of quality of loss. For example, in the Kostroma region, increasing losses of 2. 2 times, which is much lower than the average. The region did not cover the complete annihilation of the landing regiment in the first months of the war. In the Pskov region - an increase of 2. 6 times. This is a reflection of the loss of paratroopers. And how much the threat to NATO decreased.
The losses from the seaside of the seaside increased 4. 4 times. Sakhalin losses - in 4. 14. In its mass, it is a marine infantry that the Russian command has buried in the Ukrainian steppes. No wonder the material about the loss of 155 Marine Corps from the Primorsky Territory is roaming on the network - they are very sad there. The consequence is a sharp decrease in risks for Japan and South Korea.
In absolute numbers, the loss of Sakhalin and Primorye can be compared, but the relative in Sakhalin is 3. 6 times more losses. It is interesting to compare the numbers of losses from regions with the same population. For example, the number of losses in karelia is 4. 2 times higher than in Ingushetia. It is clearly visible who is more valuable for the Russian Federation. Yakutia, Transbaikal and Buryatia have a comparable population - just less than a million in each region.
In this case, the losses from Buryatia are 3 times higher than that of Yakutia, and 27% higher than in Transbaikalla. This is first and foremost a marker of permanent deployment of troops. If you look at the picture in general, there are clues about where the Kremlin has many reserves, and where the nuances have already appeared. Which allows to make estimates of strength and prioritize work with the regions of the Russian Federation.