Stuck in the 70's of the last century: Russian militarycock criticized armored vehicles of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (video)
In particular, the armored vehicles of the BTR-80, BMP-1 and BMP-2 were reached, which in practice are inferior to some characteristics of Western counterparts, which is why Russian infantry suffered large losses on the battlefield. He wrote about it on December 23 on his Telegram channel.
In the publication, the militarycock noted that this armored vehicle was developed in the Soviet era, and in the current conditions of hostilities revealed the shortcomings of the structure, which both experts and servicemen of the Russian Federation have repeatedly spoke. For example, armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles are quite inconvenient to accommodate assault rifles that are treated with modern realities. "About the lag of our APC and BMP.
I did not write only lazy that the assault man in armor and equipment is not placed in the landing compartment, not able to be properly landed from the hatch, to fight. Personally, I was more than once and not two landed with sin with a bm. 1 and BMP-2, stuck in the landing compartment, "-writes Kotonok. According to him, there are no better things with the booking of Soviet armored vehicles, which is made by means of defeat of defense forces, which is why "boxes" turn into "coffin for personnel".
On the contrary, the same M2 Bradley allows the landing to be comfortable to be comfortable inside the machine. In addition, the American BMP has a landing equipment that has repeatedly rescued the lives of soldiers in replaced areas. Above such a decision, he continued the militarycock, built in the Soviet times, but in practice it turned out that it allows to avoid instant exploration during landing.
Another advantage of Braldley was her weapons and booking, which allows not only to fight but also "win a duel" with Russian tanks. The Kotonok also disappointing also how this problem is solved by Russia's military leadership. In no way, in no way, because in the Russian military system there are still people who categorically want to change anything even in war. "The impressive backwardness, the lack of creativity. As for me, so almost catastrophe!" - emphasized the militarycock.
According to him, the real situation with the modernization of armored vehicles is very different from what broadcasts Russian propaganda on the federal channels and what official officials are officially in the spirit of "analogues". An example of this, the ill-fated T-14 T-14 "Armata", which with its "breakthrough technologies" did not appear on the battlefield.
Moreover, the Kittenok accused the propagandists of the subjects "On the Bad Non-Competitive Western Armor", while the Russian military system itself remains tight, and many decisions have not actually been viewed since the 50-70s of the last century. Analyzing the modern conflict, the author of the publication notes that the war is a driver of military innovation, as can be seen in the example of drones.