Israel Between War and Peace: Why a Ceasefire Is a Necessary Step
The ceasefire, part of a larger 20-point plan that has led to the release of hostages and a gradual reduction in hostilities in recent days, has sparked mixed emotions. Some see it as a temporary pause, while others see it as the beginning of a long road to peace. But for Israel, which has survived the horrific attack on October 7, 2023 and two years of continuous war, the move is vital.
The world's leading editors also wrote about it, analyzing both the diplomatic role of the US and domestic political risks for Tel Aviv. First, lives are more important than the danger of escalation The first and most important effect of a ceasefire is human lives saved. The release of hostages, the ability to deliver humanitarian aid, the temporary restoration of medical aid and evacuation corridors all give survivors a real chance to receive aid and prepare to rebuild.
The first phase of the plan includes exactly these elements: a ceasefire, withdrawal of forces and return of people home. This is not theoretical diplomacy; these are concrete steps that reduce the urgent humanitarian crisis. Secondly, it is a tactical victory and a strategic challenge. For Israel, the ceasefire means an opportunity to regroup, replenish supplies, reduce the costs of long-term combat operations and revive international support.
At the same time, this is not a "complete victory" over all problems: it is impossible to remove Hamas instantly, just as not every goal of war can be solved by force. That is why the plan offers a chance for further diplomatic steps, but will require close monitoring and readiness to respond to violations. Israel has been given a pause, which it must use wisely, not only for security, but also for political stabilization. Third, it is the result of the support of an ally.
The success of the current ceasefire is largely explained not by pressure, but by the political offer that Trump made to Netanyahu. Instead of threats or blackmail, he chose another way - support. Trump, who after returning to the White House made Israel one of his foreign policy priorities, provided Netanyahu with a political "umbrella" at a difficult moment: when pressure from the international community was growing and domestic opposition was demanding changes.
He did not force Israel to make concessions, but created the conditions under which peace became less of a risk than the continuation of the war. His direct communication with the leaders of the Persian Gulf countries, as well as diplomatic signals to Egypt and Qatar, helped to ease tensions in the region and ensure the agreement of the first phase of the agreement.
In effect, Trump has done what even professional diplomats rarely do: combine a tough pro-Israel stance with a real deal that preserves civilian lives and paves the way for a more stable peace. Fourth, regional stability matters to Israel The spread of the conflict beyond the borders of Gaza threatened not only Israeli security, but also the entire region. The diplomatic efforts that led to the ceasefire also reduce the risk of escalation in Lebanon, Syria or on other flanks.
This is a "new starting point" that can open the door to wider political work - if it is supported by international partners and if the local party (including the Israeli government) can fulfill the commitments made. Fifth: What Israel Should Do Now Use the pause to restore defense capabilities and protect citizens. Providing transparent mechanisms for monitoring the ceasefire and responding promptly to violations will reduce both domestic tensions and international criticism.
Promote diplomacy with neighbors and partners to turn the temporary pause into a longer period of security and economic recovery. Be prepared to make political decisions that may be unpopular but necessary for long-term stability. Leading editors emphasize: peace does not come automatically - it must be built. In summary, maintaining a cease-fire means maintaining life, security, and a chance for a future for Israelis.
This is not an abandonment of security goals, nor an abandonment of efforts to hold accountable those responsible for horrific attacks. It is a sound, responsible and, in the current circumstances, the right strategy: to stop the bloodshed, bring people home, restore resources and give ourselves a chance for a broader, realistic policy of security and peace. This peace is the beginning, it must be established and protected.