USD
41.72 UAH ▲0.33%
EUR
49.18 UAH ▲1.09%
GBP
56.99 UAH ▼0.02%
PLN
11.57 UAH ▲1.03%
CZK
2 UAH ▲1.6%
The statements that before the war, Ukrainian troops could be buried in the land...

Why Zaporozhye is not Chongar. How different war in February 2022 and in July 2023

The statements that before the war, Ukrainian troops could be buried in the land, as the Russians are now in the southern direction - unconvincing, blogger Yuri Bogdanov said. And explains why. Why Zaporozhye is not Chongar or the obvious. Disclamer. The text is based on the interviews of events and the opinion of the military, who I trust. If DeepState has written "enough politicization", then the time of liknepa about how the "border" between Crimea and the continent 02.

22 differs from the current line of defense of the Russians and our defense of the Donbass and the North. What is needed to ensure that the Russians were built in the south? Cover from the air, artillery and air defense for: and even in the presence of all this Armed Forces now gradually, very carefully and consistently destroy the defense of the Russian Federation, blurring both the leading positions, and long -range means of damage, and logistics.

Because such defense is very vulnerable to methodical influence. And let's remember the inserts that we met with 24. 02. 2022 and how we spent the first half of the war. Total advantage of the Russian Federation: the advantage at times: now about the south. Okay, we drew trenches.

How long would it take that the Russians would erase our less powerful artillery at that advantage, have killed planes, destroy logistics and leave our troops, which would be heroically sitting in trenches without security and cover? A bit. And all those who would sit in the trenches at the time of the offensive would die or captive. There would be no chance to maneuver and retreat. And not to wear with Chongar.

Under the cover of art and aviation, the Russians would not prevent the crossings and calmly cross in a few hours. Such is reality. We could not hurt them, because we did not have Himars and Western art. And so, I already wrote it, but I will repeat. In the conditions of attacks on all sides, real inferno could be lost and about… to be. Sorry, unpleasant, but it happens. And now - how differently the north and Donbas from the south. North.

Here, Russia could not fully take advantage of its advantage in the air and in art, and only in the north the tactics from "to let in columns, cut off, destroy" could work. Thanks to nature and a limited number of routes. By the way, if the Russians tried to stop at the borders-people in these positions would simply be destroyed in a day or two. And that would not change anything except the number of dead from the first Russian blow. Donbas. In Donbass, demolition of positions takes a long time.

Even if it is simply defense in an industrial zone or infrastructure (mention airport). Donbas consists of tracts, landings, industrial sites (built with a nuclear reserve), mines and even logistics are easier to organize. But even Russia's advantage in art and aviation worked here as soon as the conditions for defense were not so favorable. The dogs were demolished in zero. It is Arta. And there was a squeezed and poured quite enough.

People who say that the south had to be defended as Mariinka and Avdiivka would simply have condemned a considerable number of soldiers to a rather senseless death or captivity. It is not necessary to think that in the Armed Forces 9 years there were idiots who do not know where and how to build defense. From 2014 to 24. 02. 22 we did not increase the art park 5 times, and aircraft 20 times. But was it real? Without mistakes, it is not right. And there were enough agents, and much.