Sumy Attack: Putin laughs in Trump's face that will answer US President

Killed children in Kryvyi Rih, dozens of dead on a holiday in Sumy, not to mention all those casualties that were, are and will be. Because Putin does not want the end of the war, he does not want to end the bloodshed.

Is it swallowed by Donald Trump this time, as he swallowed with a truce in the air or with Kryvyi Rih and with blows to the civilian population, which has repeatedly happened after the so -called negotiations? Whether there were no killings of children and destroyed houses, there is an "equipment" instead . . . not a contract, not a document, not an agreement, but this name from the business world, not politics and diplomacy - "Early".

Last time, Donald Trump derived from the equilibrium that Volodymyr Zelenskyy showed him a photo of our soldiers who returned from captivity in which they were a condition . . . I would like to be very much that Donald Trump would be in Sumy today. How would his behavior change then? What would he say in that case? But these are all conversations about anything, because Donald Trump is not the politician that can be dealt with and trusted.

I will not be surprised if at a certain historical moment we give up the mediation and initiative of the DT administration. So far, it does not carry any positive points, and I do not see the prospects and expediency of keeping this connection. As for the war crime, terror against civilians is an unchanging tactics of the roar. Especially when they are not going to plan on the battlefield and diplomacy.

As for Sumy, on the background of the fact that recently Russian propaganda is persistently spreading the narrative about the great, epic offensive in Sumy region, the occupation of the city itself and the whole region, it is not surprising that terror against civilians is now catalyzed. So it was with Kharkiv, so it was with Zaporozhye, so it was even with Odessa . . . Terror and murder imitate opportunities and sow panic among the local population.

It is obvious that this tactic, which is to catalyze terror and destruction, aimed at moving morally and psychologically on Ukrainians and, as a consequence, as a consequence, within society, they created preconditions for pressure on the country's leadership and negotiation processes. Let me remind you that terror is not just the usual state of the mentality of Russian invaders, it is the concept of war of the Russian army inherited from the USSR.

Even in the USSR, one of the tactical ones and even said that the strategic elements of the wars were laid an element of the terror of civilians. In other words, the purposeful destruction of civilian infrastructure and the murder of civilians in order to spread panic among civilians, the chaoticization of the internal socio-political situation and the moral and psychological pressure on power, through a civil segment, with coercion to the fastest capitulation.