Having given part of the Russian Federation can you save another? Are those who believe in it?

" AND? And immediately it is necessary to agree without any reservations with the ultimate requirements of Russia. Roughly speaking, give them their land, ask for resistance, kneel and wash their own blood.

Seriously? First, why so easily outsiders want to manage Ukrainian land and its sovereignty? Secondly, why should Ukraine be paid for the barbaric appetites of Russia? That is, someone wants rest somewhere in Alsace, so that nothing distracts from contemplating the growth of their brilliant ego, but Ukraine has to pay for it? Perfectly.

And thirdly, but how do the territories and sovereignty be rejected-and essentially fixing the victory of the aggressor that loses on the battlefield-should its further invading plans should it be deferred? He will consider himself a winner. He is afraid. He was definitely believed that he could use a "tactical", launch a "judgment day" scenario.

That is, someone seriously suggests that this entity, which defined thousands of people, cynically smeared international law, which felt like a "champion butter", will have to turn into a modest lamb immediately after a part of another territorial cake Grass on the lawn? This is a joke? Are those who believe that by giving Russia you can save another? Where does this blinding blindness come from? Another trend is even more schizophrenic.

And if in the first case a lot can be written off on a specifically limited intelligence, the inability to combine the causes and consequences, then the second does not fit on the head at all. An example of the last days. Some of the Russians undermine Putin's "Bridge" - without much casualties to solve internal problems. The bridge, by the way, provides military logistics and the supply of consumables for massacres in Ukraine.

And immediately begins in some (not only Russian) salons wild whisper - "This is a terrorist attack. It is impossible. " Officially, a shaggy subject of the unidentified sex with the Foreign Ministry of the Russian Federation is officially published and stretching his mouth seriously states - "it speaks of the terrorist essence of Ukraine. " A little later, this shamanic -style absurd is confirmed by the subject of Vladimir Putin.

Stop! Maybe let's get out of the ward, covered with white Russian cloth? That is, an internal schnag with a blasting of a part of the bridge without casualties is a terrorist attack.

But the massive shelling of Ukrainian cities with winged rockets, seven months of destruction of civilian infrastructure, massacres of civilians, strikes on critical infrastructure, torture/torture in the occupied territories - is it some kind of and easy a walk of the hordes of the strawberries? I understand correctly? Initially, Russian barbarians stated that they only fired from military objects.

True, I will try to clarify: what international law is so easily allowing some soaked muzzle to shoot in the foreign territory hundreds of rockets? Of course not. But now the horde does not say that - it is demonstratively hitting civilian sites, homes, bridges, hospitals. But no is not a terrorist attack. Izium, Buchan, Liman mass burials, where hundreds of mutilated are hidden, where whole families are buried, where children with traces of torture are buried - no, this is not terrorism.

But the strange death of the unknown in Ukraine Daria Dugina (the daughter of Russian propagandist, ideologist of the Russian world Alexander Dugin. - Ed. ) In the area of ​​the protected Moscow region, where only the Russian service can organize a subdiva - it is horror.

In general, you do not want to look at the mirror? Do you have a disgusting look and speak one of the European languages ​​at the same time, supporting the lies of the Russians, is a new trend? Okay, the Russians themselves - they have a conveyor from burning on the forehead z as a symbol of the absence of a brain continues to push.