Why do technological companies don't leave Russia despite US sanctions

From Ukraine, the Finnish company appealed to Finland and the United States regulators to formally fulfill their obligations under contracts concluded in the Russian Federation, including the continuation of licenses for software, the supply of spare parts and technical support. About it reports RBC with reference to its sources in companies and government. Russian thematic resources also confirm this news. How Nokia will interact with Russia - it is not yet clear.

After the Finnish company left the country, several companies began to be supported, including the St. Petersburg Service Telesystems, created in the summer by one of the former leaders of the projects of the Department of Network Routing and Nokia Russia's Nokia Ror (100 %). It can be assumed that Mr. Votolevsky is a nominal figure designed to hide actual beneficiaries.

Unfortunately, despite the pathetic rhetoric of the first weeks of the sanction campaign, the United States was subsequently allowed their companies to work in the Russian Federation, referring to humanitarian reasoning. Unfortunately, despite the pathetic rhetoric of the first weeks of the sanction campaign, the United States was subsequently allowed their companies to work in the Russian Federation, referring to humanitarian reasoning.

It is logical that the Finns were asked: the worse they are than the Americans, the more Nokia has American roots in the form of Alcatel-Lucent and Bell Labs? And another important fact: in recent years, Nokia has lost a remarkable share of the Russian market, giving way to Ericsson and Huawei. Competitors squeezed the company in the region, mainly at the expense of favorable proposals for swamping. Yes, researchers from Skoltech give a Finnish company about 25% of the market.