By Natali Moss
The publication published photos of a relevant linguistic study, where the expert refused to answer the question of the presence of signs of violation of hostility or hatred in the deputy, humiliation of representatives of a group of persons, as well as justifying violent actions. According to the linguist, there are no signs of extremism in some of the words of the general, and in other matters "there are positions that are legal in nature", which is not within the competence of a specialist.
As noted in the publication, it is about General Andrei Gurulev that Putin supports 80% of the population, and the rest - "rotting, it should be, if not isolated, then at least somehow destroyed. " The deputy of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg Boris Vyshnevsky, who asked Gurulev for extremism, stated in Telegram, which would challenge the corresponding decision of the examination.
"Well, it was necessary to try very much and very widely to close your eyes so that they would not see everything. Here in the Ministry of Internal Affairs and tried. It turns out that the call to" destroy "is not a call for violence. And not a threat," - the message reads. We will remind, earlier the Committee on Deputies of Ethics of the State Duma, headed by Valentina Tereshkova, responded to the statement of deputy Andriy Gurulev, who urged to get rid of 20% of Russians.
English
Українська
USA
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Polski
Čeština
Español
Slovensku
