The military disagree: why fighters oppose Ukraine's agreements with the Russian Federation

Since the beginning of a full -scale invasion, media military in Ukraine has become a force that forms public opinion. And not to pay attention to their vision of the end of the war will not work. Focus found out whether the country's management would be able to negotiate with defenders when the issue of negotiations with the Russian Federation would raise. Bogdan Krotevich, Chief of Staff of the Azov Brigade, made disagreement with those who support the end of the war on the front line.

"No peace without victory. Victory is one - no Russian soldier in the territory of Ukraine. We will not leave this war on the descendants and you will not leave it too, because if you try, it will be bad. And you and them. If it is a" punch ", not even Think. In particular, Krotevich's statements were supported by the military, including the Armed Forces veteran Maxim Kolesnikov. Krotevich did not explain about which "breakfast".

However, the publication probably became a response to the statement of political scientist Volodymyr Fesenko that the main interest of Ukraine is "not just to return the territory, but to preserve the state, the nation. And the territories can be returned later. " "Media people, in particular the military, often express personal opinion.

But at the same time, there are reasons for such statements - our authorities are constantly provoking society because it often changes its opinion on hostilities," says Focus of the reserve of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleg Zhdanov. The expert notes that in the two years of the Great War, the political leadership of the country has formed an uncompromising position of society - a truce from the Russian Federation is impossible until a number of conditions have been fulfilled.

One of which is the withdrawal of Russian troops to the borders of 1991. However, recently, government officials have not focused on this key thesis. "Today, President Zelensky is already saying that through intermediaries to negotiate with the Russian Federation.

What did they fought for? According to political expert Oleg Posternak, media military, who have been in various media from the beginning of a full -scale invasion and gathered a thousandth audience on social networks, have weight and influence, forming public opinion. "Usually they articulating either their own position or ordering certain political groups.

Having potential and political ambitions, media military gives any evaluation of events to show the authorities that they need to be considered. It is not necessary to exclude that some media military may be They are with certain political groups that do not miss the opportunity to attack Bank, narrowing all the problems for betrayal and surrender. Seeing loved ones.

Political scientist Igor Reityrovich adds that Bohdan Krotevich's "Azov" is considered a person who is loyal to power than the opposition. Perhaps such statements, voiced by the Media Military, in the information field create a contradiction between politicians and the military, then to compromise. "The authorities are gradually realizing that it will have to be negotiated. And therefore, probably prepare an information field - yes, there will be frost, but we do not give up the territories.

The army will remain an important component of the state, but we will have to accept the fact that some of the territories are temporarily occupied and we are occupied We will return them political and diplomatically. According to Posternak, recently there is a "warming" in the information field for peace initiatives. So, in a recent interview with the American press, Volodymyr Zelenskyy made it clear what format of negotiations with Moscow is acceptable for Kiev.

And in an interview with journalist Natalia Mosaychuk, a political scientist close to Banking, which is close to Bankkova, emphasized that the formula of Ukraine's victory was to preserve the state and the nation and bring the country to the EU and NATO. "Negotiations with the Russian Federation, as Zelensky noted, can be under the type of grain agreement.

That is, a separate contract with intermediaries, and then a separate agreement of intermediaries with the Russian Federation," - continues Posternak. Of course, in the context of the completion of hostilities, media military is a significant force with which the country's political leadership should be considered as they receive a large number of citizens. Therefore, according to Posternak, the country's management will act gently to negotiate.

"The society will be carefully given a peaceful initiative, there will be an intermediate agreement. And although the media will be in opposition to the authorities, they will be able to agree with the most active part, and the other part will not be so important to bring people on the street," the expert said. Zhdanov at the same time notes that in his environment the military is not ready for compromises. And in general, it will be difficult for Ukrainians to take peace initiatives.

"People are so sensitive to these moments - victory or surrender. The words" compromise "for them do not exist for them. If we were left alone with the Russian Federation, and there would be a choice - either destruction If the authorities planned such a result in advance, it was necessary to talk about it. The expert adds that a rare family has not affected the war in Ukraine.

Therefore, according to Zhdanov, the people will not compromise, and if such a scenario will be imposed, people will go outside. "For people, including the military, agreed to a temporary compromise, there should be a huge tragedy on the country where we lose territories and people. Then the society will break and agree. Otherwise, people will go outside and" demolish "power," - Summarizes Zhdanov.