The Kremlin ignores complaints: ISW analyzed the defeat of the armor of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation near Donetsk

"The completely remote defeat of a helpless armored group" has caused differences and points to the wider problems associated with the possibility of the Russian military to adapt to the conditions of war in Ukraine. About it writes "Institute of War Study" in the summary of February 3. One of the Russian military bloggers on February 3 stated that "sincere patriots" were disappointed with the shots of a failed offensive on January 30.

The "militarycore" criticized "traitors", including experts who often attend the TV show of the Kremlin propagandist Vladimir Solovyov. "Sale TV*Ri from Solovyov's Nest", as they were baptized by the propagandist, stated that Russian troops allegedly sufficient stocks of radio electronic struggle systems (IDPs) and communication to reflect the strikes of Ukrainian FPV-punks.

"Activic", referring to personal conversations with Russian military stationed under Avdiivka, noted that such statements are not true, because "there are no radio stations as many of the equipment we have burning. " Several other "military" complained that Russian military-political leadership would probably not pay attention to these complaints. The problem associated with the advantage of Ukrainian drones on the forefront was called one of the most relevant for the Russian Federation.

According to analysts, the statement of Russian President Vladimir Putin that the drone is the "Achilles Fifth" of the Russian troops, suggests that the Russian leadership is worried about the ability of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation to adapt and restore maneuvering on the battlefield. Recall that the Armed Forces advanced near Bakhmut. The ISW named the converted territories. It was also reported that the Kremlin warns against the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine.