Joe Biden and the Third World War. Why Korean troops in Ukraine is a failure of US diplomacy

NATO Secretary -General Mark Rutte confirmed Russia's involvement in the DPRK in the war against Ukraine. He called on Russia and the DPRK to stop these actions immediately. It became known that there will be no new restrictions on the use of US weapons, even if North Korea enters the war. The US will not impose additional restrictions on the use of US weapons in the event of North Korea's involvement in the conflict, Pentagon said. That is, Ukraine will not be forbidden to shoot the North Koreans.

Serious reaction. Well, US President J. Biden, commenting on the situation, said "it is very dangerous, very dangerous. " With regard to the latter, I think it is worth explaining that it is not so dangerous for us (although it is, of course, to us, of course, it is really dangerous, because any reinforcement of the aggressor carries risks), as for Baiden himself.

It is symbolic that the appearance of the North Koreans on the front is expected in the last days before the US President's elections, after which Biden will leave this post. And it is before this "resignation" that the event marks the full, total failure of Baiden's foreign policy line, which will have far -reaching negative consequences. Not only for Ukraine - for the US itself.

The entry of the North Koreans into the war is just the same "escalation" that was so sought to be avoided in Washington. The consequences will be unpredictable. The DPRK, according to Western media, has already received $ 5. 5 billion from the Russians for weapons and shells. What will get for "cannon meat" is unknown, but it is obvious that not just oil with corn.

In the media, they write about nuclear weapons technologies, aviation for which pilots from the DPRK are already studying in the Russian territory. The North Korean Army itself will gain combat experience in the most serious war of today. Soon the DPRK will become a serious military power, and this power is already openly threatening one of the most important allies of the US - the Republic of Korea. The Russians have even formalized the Treaty with the DPRK. In turn - a similar contract with Iran.

Weapons, also aviation, air defense, nuclear technologies. Another key ally of the US, Israel, prepare. Here is a military conflict, which will be forced to enter the United States directly, is not far off. And what next? Global conflict? And when US soldiers are fighting in this war of the future, the only one to whom they will be forced to thank is Joe Biden. Because he "boiled" it all. Perhaps even for "best reasons" - not to "spread war".

But Chamberlain from Daladier, too, did not want "escalation", and what all this ended - everyone knows. Apparently, it is not very nice to feel that in future history textbooks you will be placed next to Chamberlain and Daladier. Therefore, obviously, Baiden's administration is now occupied by "image projects". One of these projects is the book by the famous journalist Bob Woodworth - War, which has recently been published.

There is a lot of direct language and information about discussions that have been conducted in the White House in recent years. It describes the "serious nuclear threat", which hangs over Ukraine after September 2022 by the Russian authorities. The negotiations of the Russian and US Minister of Defense, etc. are described. Woodworth retells an episode that seemed to be during that period.

Shortly after the conversation of American and Russian defense ministers, Biden allegedly told the National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan: "If we do not expel Russia from Ukraine completely, then somewhat will allow Putin to reach the desired. Without the use of nuclear weapons. So, the most desirable result of the war for the United States was either Putin to agree to freeze the conflict, or wait for something to break something in Russia itself. In fact, all this seems justification.

The US president "saved" all from "nuclear war". It does not need to be criticized for the consequences of his strategy to "prevent great victories of Ukraine", which eventually led to a close union of Russians, North Koreans with Iranians (and a bunch of different terrorists). Justification so. The threat of nuclear weapons has always been observed - from the moment it was invented. But this did not prevent the previous US leaders from drawing a fairly rigid geopolitical line. No, it's different.

The United States wanted to "play" with the Russians limited "war" according to "certain rules", and then freeze everything to show "victory" themselves, but also to the Russians give "victory" so that the Putin regime was not injured, Rashka did not fall apart and could be possible It is easy to wait for it for a "democratic transit" with the participation of "liberal opposition".

To do this, it was necessary to constantly limit the military potential of Ukraine, while not letting it lose, that everything was "decent". But they forgot that they sat down to play chess with a psychopath, for whom the conquest of Ukraine is the main obsession for which he would go for everything. And he left. The war, which they wanted to be kept within Ukraine, had already spread around the world, responding in the Middle East and defrosting the conflict that has been ashamed for decades.

In the queue - East Asia. And then? And further there will be nothing good either. And at the heart of this is only one thing-the "reconciliation" of one psychopathic dictator-terrorist and the desire to keep his damned state. This will be the legacy of the current US President - the lighting of the World War. Of course, he can still do something. Time is. But there is clearly no desire. He will just say that "it is dangerous. " Dangerously. For all. All this is very bad for everyone.