In the US demanded to transfer to Ukraine missiles ATACMS and threatened Russia nuclear retribution

Two people from this group of experts recently attended meetings with the participation of representatives of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine. In their open address to the Presidential Administration, they said that the war in Ukraine reached a key stage and called on to expand the Armed Forces military support.

Baiden's administration successfully supported the allies - gave significant military assistance, in particular, this month helped the valiant Armed Forces of Ukraine, according to the publication. At the same time, they complained that it was not possible to create a convincing strategic narrative that would allow public support to attract NATO in the long run.

Ukraine needs long -range missiles to resist the offensive of the Russians, in particular, to destroy the supply lines, fuel supply and ammunition depots. This means that the United States needs to supply ATACMS missiles for high -mobile HIMARS systems with a radius of up to 300 km. This would allow Ukraine to affect military goals anywhere in the country, including in temporarily occupied Crimea.

Continuous supply of weapons and spare parts for artillery platforms that the Armed Forces receive from different countries is required. Some of these details are not interchangeable. These systems are constantly operating, so their repair is critical. In addition, Ukraine needs low and medium-range air defense to resist Russian air and missile strikes.

"The need to use adequate countermeasures to confront the drones of Russian production and new UAVs, which the Russian Federation tries to buy from Iran," said analysts say. In this direction, Baiden's administration has not yet taken decisive steps not to provoke Russia, or, as the national defense adviser Jake Sullivan said at the Asphen Forum, "to avoid the Third World.

" "Putin and other high -ranking officials before and after the invasion of February 24 repeatedly reminded the West of the Nuclear War. But the US is also a nuclear state, and it would be a strategic mistake to believe that nuclear restraint* no longer works. Nuclear deterioration is still working in the application of national security experts. *Nuclear restraint is a military doctrine that involves nuclear impact. "There was nothing threatening with nuclear war, but not starting it.

"What happens if we allow Putin to intimidate and stop the supply of weapons needed to Ukraine to stop Russian auditism," the US representatives ask a rhetorical issue, noting that Putin can threaten the nuclear stick and Baltic countries.

"Why does the administration not admit that Putin does not dare to do the same for Estonia and Poland, if such tactics have already worked in Ukraine?" - says in a letter under which they set their digital signatures: David Kremtor, former Deputy Secretary of State of the United States; General Philip Bridlav, Supreme Commander of the Union Troops in Europe; Debra Kagan, a former US defense employee; Robert McConnell, exponential prosecutor; Kurt Volker, former US Special Representative in Ukraine and others.