In the Russian Federation fears that the US is neutralizing Russian nuclear weapons - the media

In one of the Russian online magazines, an article on the United States plan appeared, which allegedly consisted of destroying the significant part of the nuclear potential of the Russian Federation before Moscow decides to response.

The publication was widely replicated in the Russian Federation, it says that in the medium term, the United States would try to stock up on strategic non -nuclear weapons with a short teenage time to a goal that would not be subject to any international restrictions. Such strategic high -efficiency fire systems should operate on the principle of a reconnaissance shock complex, weapons of energy -directed energy and other promising systems.

The article of one of the news agencies stated that "the theory of restraint in the US and NATO countries has been replaced by the theory of preventive force. " The United States is allegedly planning strategic offensive operations, within which a significant number of Russian nuclear weapons would be destroyed before the command decides to strike. Such a widely read publication appeared after Russian President Vladimir Putin hinted at the possible use of nuclear weapons.

Last month, Putin accused the event of "nuclear blackmail". According to him, the Russian Federation will use all means to protect what he called his territorial integrity. According to the Arms Control Association last January, Russia has 6257 nuclear warheads, while the United States is 5550. At the same time, Western intelligence sees does not see a sign that the Russian Federation is preparing a nuclear stroke.

But Baiden's administration was still disturbed by nuclear rhetoric coming from the Russian Federation. Pavel Divig, the head of the Geneva Research Project "Russian Nuclear Forces", recently said in an interview with journalists that it would be necessary to remove it from storage and drive to the front of the journalists. And it would be difficult to hide such activity.

In addition, because of the long front line, it is difficult to determine the corresponding military target of a tactical nuclear impact. According to him, the only use of nuclear weapons, which would have at least expediency, is a strategic one. One that would shock Ukraine and make it surrender.

"But in order for the blow to be shocking enough, they would have to kill dozens or even hundreds of thousands of people," said a researcher from Geneva, who hopes that it is too high a strap even for the Kremlin. Earlier, Focus reported that, according to Putin, Hiroshima and Nagasaki proves that nuclear blows in big cities are not needed to win the war. We will remind that Dmitry Medvedev once again stated that the Russian Federation has a weapon to "send enemies to the hey fiery.