Iron dome above Kiev. How Ukraine will respond to rocket-okola terror of

What is the purpose of the enemy -powerful air strikes, how much it will be enough and what can we answer and what to expect? We spread on shelves. The goal is absolutely transparent. And absolutely unattainable: to force Ukraine to give up the offensive and sit at the negotiating table with the aggressor on its conditions. It is the echo of the Duke Doctrine, which NATO used against Yugoslavia, and the Russian Federation against the rebel areas of Syria.

Realities confirm what I say for a long time: Imperimperia has the ability to produce and upgrade 50-70 missiles of different types a month and receive or collect or collect from machine complexes about 150 "Shahmed". With these means, she tries to deplete our ABA, to create a missile deficit for Nativ SPR. And then apply bombing aviation against Ukraine. Inform: NATO is able to count much better than in the Russian Federation.

That is why the United States is already giving us 300 million to the SCR missiles, in particular, the same Petriot that Konashenko has been destroyed three times in a row. By the way, the parameters of the latest modification of this complex transmitted to Ukraine were even better than in the manufacturer's advertising booklets. Unlike the crazy S-400, which welcomes primitive drones of unknown origin. The volume of supplies of anti -aircraft missiles from our allies will increase.

Instead, I do not see the real capacity of the enemy to continue the attacks of such efficiency for more than a month, a maximum of two. Especially if a large -scale Ukrainian offensive began during this period. But Ukraine is almost guaranteed to expect the most powerful combined air strike, something like the attempt of knockout. But after such an unsuccessful attempt, the activity of the aggressor will gradually subside and return to the usual intensity.

Today, in addition to strengthening the Ukrainian air defense, it is nothing to contrast the air terror of the shortage. The strikes of the elite suburbs of Moscow cause a crazy capture of ordinary Russians, which makes it publicly indignant at nightingale-skabes, but do not affect the Kremlin's actions and intentions. But in the future there are options. First of all, we need long -range missiles and sea drones to sink the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation, including rocket launchers.

And to destroy the Crimean bridge to cut the logistics of supplying missiles and drones from Russia. From a technical point of view, this has become quite real. The aggressor will still have his grouping at the Caspian, but it is inferior to the Russian Federation. After the emergence of fighters, the F-16 will have a fundamental opportunity to intercept enemy strategic bombers before they release their missiles.

And in general, modern fighters will significantly increase Ukraine's ability to resist air attacks. As for Shahaneda, the situation is quite difficult. It is very difficult to cut the supply of these drones (or sets for harvesting) with Irania or through post-Soviet transitors. It remains to be hoped that during the next exacerbation between Iran and Afghanistan, unidentified planes will be destroyed by Iranian drones.