USD
41.29 UAH ▲0.1%
EUR
43.47 UAH ▼0%
GBP
52.19 UAH ▼0.11%
PLN
10.01 UAH ▼0.06%
CZK
1.71 UAH ▼0.25%
The fear of Western leaders before Putin is caused by the fact that they believe...

Why Trump is not afraid of Putin: The match of two rational inadequate

The fear of Western leaders before Putin is caused by the fact that they believed in his inadequacy, says analyst Pavel Vernivsky. That is why in the Russian game the great chances of Trump, who gives himself the same inadequat. One of Trump's key benefits I consider his impulsiveness and unpredictability. In the book on the theory of Igor Nylbaff and Dixitis, this set of qualities is a great set for implementing a strategy called irrational rationality.

When irrational behavior is used to achieve rational goals. Because for the maximum efficiency of this irrational behavior, it should look very convincing and supported by the appropriate image. Well, for example, all people of Caucasian nationality are considered impulsive, inadequate and ready to kill for a small image. It is formed by the years of the image that the Caucasians use to intimidate people and achieve their goals.

By the way, the Russians also use the image of the Cadyrivs to intimidate and the persuasiveness of this image is so high that it is rare to check it. And although it is an example of everyday life, it is also working at the interstate level. Why do Western countries fear Putin? Not because it has a nuclear button. They also have it. And because he demonstrates his willingness to apply it, showing that he spit on the number of his own victims who will be in return.

At the same time, the event is not ready for such a change. Here Putin also uses the technique of "irrational rationality" to achieve his goals. And in order for this strategy to work, it is necessary for your opponents to be careful, indecisive and afraid to lose what they have. Biden and all European leaders were just like that. And here Trump is the person who can play this game no worse than Putin. The author expresses a personal opinion that may not coincide with the editorial position.