They broke on. As the Armed Forces operate in the Kherson region

All trolls are blocked without further discussions. If you want to discuss the War, so do: Explain your point of view, present your evidence. If not, I do not force you to read or even think about what I publish. Video day today will be (very) unfair: it will be about fighting in the Kherson region, only about them and again about them. So it will be unfair to those who fight in other places. Sorry, but the news is too much and there is not enough time.

As always, the following will be a mixture of confirmed and unconfirmed information, a little folk intelligence, a little rumor - mostly - never officially confirmed (or if, "after a few weeks"). Therefore, some may consider the bold and contradictory that I "dare" to publish such content. Keep in mind that getting perfect cross -confirmation still takes at least 5–10 days, and events on the battlefield develop very quickly.

Thus, if someone decides to treat the whole barrel (not just a drop) of doubt, I will perceive normally. Serious, constructive corrections are always welcome, but one -line emphasizing "you are not right" do not impress me. Kherson North was reported earlier, on the morning of September 4, the game was over for the last unit of the Airborne, which was still in the south.

After the battalion tactical group of the 126th Brigade of Coast Defense was unable to repel Potemkin and Olgine in the 60th Ukrainian Brigade and thus provide a safe land connection with them, assistance in their evacuation was provided by BTG Wagner. The Wagnets reported that they managed to "unlock" their mouth and bring it out, but Ukrainians still showed some photos of Russian servicemen captured there and at least a few of the OBT (main combat tank) and BMP.

At that time, Russian operations in Olgin, Vysokon -Pilly and Potemkin served the purpose of keeping positions, as they were already in the process of loss of all their strongholds to the east, including the New Volosoznesensky, Mirovolyubivka, Petrovka and District Old Sill to Chereshnev, Novovoskresensky, Bilyaevka, Ukrainka, to Shevchenkivka. Only the Arkhangelsk still kept: there were (and there are) Ukrainians, but probably not yet control this place.

So far, everything was "still under control" - if it were not for a new problem in the East. The Ukrainian 128th Mining Brigade was already in the process of storming the godparents and Shevchenkivka. Probably, in cooperation with another unit of the Armed Forces (Ukrainians do not attack, if they cannot carry out a bilateral attack), she has broken the BTG 83rd Guards Air Force and bypassed her position, somewhere between the Golden Beam and Mikhailovka.

According to folk intelligence, as of September 5, Ukrainians really reached the area between Ukrainian and Novo Alexandrovka, leaving no headquarters of the XX Army Corps of another choice, except to evacuate what remained from the 83rd, across the Dnieper River.

Perhaps, as a "confirmation" of this later, during September 5, there were rumors that the Southern OSC has hurried to send two BTG towards New Kakhovka: one of the Lower Sirogoz (South Zaporozhye), the other of the occupied Crimea through the Transfiguration. I do not know the center of what the Armed Forces is still investing in this industry: it doesn't make sense to me.

However, I do not have any key to understanding the considerations of the OK South, its course of thoughts and planning - and I do not know anyone who understood something here. One can only guess that, given what is happening in other sections of this battlefield, Ukrainians are "happy", holding Russians obsessed with Ingulets and provokes them on regular counterattacks. You see, there is a principle of "keeping for your nose, cones in . . . ".

At least, according to Keystone Cops in Moscow (so the author calls the Ministry of Defense of Russia - NV), it is the only section of the front line in the Kherson region that deserves attention.

Perhaps this is because Wagner reports the complete absence of air and artillery support of the northern plot? At the same time, in the Russian reaction to what is happening there, there is a clear pattern: they lose another place, not to mention it, but then emphasize that they "counter -attack and destroy" with a large pump. And that's all right, because they can show some visual evidence of the destroyed or enthusiastic Ukrainian BMP.

After all, according to some Russian speakers on social networks, they have already "destroy" the whole bridgehead three times . . . It is reported that unlike the North Sector, the CCS is very active. On September 4 and 5, it was reported on the principle of "Pli and Pray" from the dry pond and the white well. Meanwhile, the Ukrainians not only liberated the grace, but also broke through the southeast and liberated Kostroma, even more expanding the bridgehead.

Of course, the Russians counter -attack, and everything is "wonderful". South in the south resembles a maritime battle, in which one side is limited to the maintenance of the "islands" and the other "maneuvering of its fleet between these islands. " To understand this better, get acquainted with my explanations published a few days ago. These "islands" are villages fortified by the Russians: they are "surrounded" by Ukrainians who maneuver them into the flank and the rear.

Which holds the Russian "front line", it is an artillery of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation - its actions often hamper or make Ukrainians retreat - or to attack - to avoid fire. Keep in mind that the Russian military doctrine focuses on attack/initiative so much that you can say: "The attack is all that the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation can really do.

" Even Russian defensive tactics consist of counterattack or at least measures aimed at a quick counterattack and returning the initiative (so not only Keystone Cops in Moscow, but all their speakers are so obsessed with the Ukrainian offensive "failure" and declare "counterattacks" ). However, they are also good in the construction of large fortifications.

First of all, they are not one of those who are going to surrender and escape during the attack, no matter how low their fighting spirit is: the mass of their troops is fairly fatalistic to obey orders, regardless of what is happening to the left or right of them. Therefore, there are orders on counterattack on the ruins of the next village, lost and returned three to four times before.

Not surprisingly, there are many reports of deep penetration of the Armed Forces, many reports that the seats were moved several times from hand to hand, but little material evidence of the actual dismissal of a settlement.

From excerpts reported by different instances, you can remove about the same (as always, from north to south): Blessed: Ukrainian Kiselivka (the one on Ingulka): Russian Vavilovo and Central: Russians Schmidtovo: Ukrainian (was the center of the 2nd line Defense of Russia) Novokyivka: Russian Lyubomyrivka: Ukrainian Thornovov: Ukrainian Green Grove: Ukrainian Barvinok: Ukrainian Krumy Yar: Cishalivka (the one near M14): Sign (and cruelly) Soldier: Ukrainian Pravdin: Ukrainian Parishevka: Ukrainian Alexandrovka (and what on the shore): Ukrainian.

Against the backdrop of reports that the Russians returned the Tomin Balka on September 4 (which was "confirmed" by the fact that the Ukrainians then fired at the local ammunition composition, which was still burning on Sunday morning), the "most impressive" was the message Which in the morning of September 5, Bilozer is under the control of Ukraine.

Before you explode by indignant: "Tom, now you are completely crazy": Given that I described above, I have no doubt that Ukrainians have "freedom" to manage certain units "between" local Russian support points, deep enough: I cannot say if they really liberated this place because there is no evidence that they did. But if they did it, they deeply "entered" into the southern flank of the Russian "Fort Chernobayivka" (which includes Kherson International Airport).

The rear today is undoubted that the Russian abandoned the idea of ​​building a barge bridge next to the Antonovsky Automobile Bridge. The latter is under such a deadly fire of Ukrainian artillery that they focused on supporting their ferries nearby. This is crucial for the supply of their troops in Kherson. Well, no one said that the life of a Russian military engineer is easy or something worth it.

Note, at the end of this review, those who take this war on this war may also want to understand Russia's dependence on Western high technologies. In response to all such questions, I can not help to check this tweet. This is an indisputable confirmation that Western IT is used in winged 3M14 and X-101, KA-52 helicopters, even in such "old" high-precision ammunition as X-59 (confess, "even I" is surprised that such Old, Soviet technology still needs Western high technologies for work).