The rake of history. Seven facts of lies in Putin's speech on the announcement of partial mobilization

We are not going to impose anything for anyone. " And what was it and continues? In his new "historical" speech on September 21, the announcement of partial mobilization in Russia - "Father of Lies" continues this line related directly to the black military special propaganda, the techniques of which Putin is actively used. But the next - the more. Vladimir Putin declared a mobilization in the Russian Federation with a conscription allegedly 300,000.

It has already caused pillars at the airports and border crossings of Russia. At the same time, after declaring mobilization, Putin persistently calls the war special operation. Although, for the "operation", which lasts seven months and which should be used up to half a million Russian troops-if you count those 130-150 thousand that were already in Ukraine? Putin violated the mental formula of Russia: watchman - external aggression - victory.

And I would like to remind that in the XX century all the wars, which Russia began on its initiative or contributed to their solution, ended with a failure for it: Russian-Japanese (1904-1905), Soviet-Finnish (1939-1940), Soviet- Afghan (1979-1989). As for the first-in fact, the Japanese attacked the first, the ships of the Japanese fleet were the first to attacked the Russian squadron in port arthur.

However, Nicholas II was obsessed with a "Great Asian Program" for several years - he wanted to expand the Russian Empire to the east: the king dreamed of creating "October" in Manchuria and the acceptance of the titles of Bohdan Chinese and Mikado Japanese. The main obstacle to the expansion of the East was Japan. Their interests began to face in China and Korea.

This, among other things, was like a "hybrid war": under the guise of loggers to Korea, Russian officers and soldiers were thrown to the dressed, military facilities were built. During the royal court there was a struggle of peaceful and military directions of development of Russia. Representatives of the second, and the words of the Minister of Internal Affairs Pleve went down in history: "A small victorious war is needed to prevent the revolution.

" This is reminiscent of Putin's military intervention in different countries - Georgia, Ukraine, Syria - to switch the attention of dissatisfied Russians - from the swamp area and clean ponds - outside. But the war with Japan came out not small or victorious. The historian Klyuchevsky wrote: "The Russo-Japanese War revealed the full unsuitability of the fleet, its material part and personnel, and a number of deep flaws in the Land Army.

" As a result, Russia lost port arthur and southern Sakhalin, and the destabilization of society in the war in the war led to the 1905 revolution. The Soviet-Finnish War in Moscow wanted to end in two weeks and win it with a gift of Stalin (on December 21, 1939 he was 60 years old). But the war lasted from November 1939 to March 1940.

There are two of its reasons: ensuring the safety of Leningrad (the border to move the border from the city from 20 to 70 km towards Finland) and the Sovietization White ", former royal combat General Mannerheim). Soviet Minister Molotov, boasting, reminded Helsinki on the eve of the invasion that "the population of one Leningrad is more than all of Finland. " As a result of the planned provocation of the USSR, the war began.

However, because of the Mannerheim's defensive "line" and the sustainability of Finnish soldiers, they concluded a peace treaty in four months. Little Finland retained its statehood. Mannerheim remained in place, but the Finns lost 11% of the territory (with Vyborg). The Soviet Union paid a significant price: 25,000 people were killed on the Finnish side, and 126,000 were killed from the Soviet, five more.

The same ratio in the numbers of fallen Ukrainians and Russians: according to official data of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, today it is about 10 thousand Ukrainians and 50 thousand Russians. As for the Afghan war (the USSR introduced there "limited contingent troops"), which stretched for a long ten years and claimed the lives of 15,000 people (including Ukrainians) - it is impossible to speak about its at least a slightly profitable result for the Soviet Union.