USD
41.28 UAH ▼0.05%
EUR
43.65 UAH ▼1.91%
GBP
52.33 UAH ▼2.16%
PLN
10.11 UAH ▼1.84%
CZK
1.73 UAH ▼2.17%
Volunteer and blogger Nazar Prikhodko filed a complaint with the qualification a...

The lawyer of the scandalous Russian criminal offense has been complained to the CDC of the Bar - the media

Volunteer and blogger Nazar Prikhodko filed a complaint with the qualification and disciplinary commission of the Kyiv Bar of Kyiv against the defender of the Russian criminal "authority" Tamaza Somhishvili Taras Dumich. About this Prikhodko wrote on his Facebook page, reports Glavcom.

According to him, Dumich continues to defend the Russian entrepreneur, despite the publication of GUR, the information that he is a Russian citizen, and despite the investigation of Ukrainian journalists who found out that his enterprises are contractors of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, who repair Russian planes and modernize missiles .

According to Glavkom, Nazar Prikhodko has already wrote about Tamaz Somhishvili, nicknamed Tamaz Tobolsky, which requires 4 billion UAH from the Kiev authorities as a compensation for alleged damage. In fact, the company Somhvishili, which was subject to reconstructing Kharkiv Square, has not done any work. Instead, according to journalists, Somhishvili has a plant in Georgia, which is repaired by Russian battle aircraft.

According to Prikhodko, the Russian criminal is defended by the Ukrainian lawyer Taras Dumich. "He calls Tamaz Somhishvili for some reason a" British investor ", although the GUR of Ukraine confirms the Russian passport of Somhishvili. The lawyer Dumich allows himself to offend the President and the Minister of Defense. Zelensky in his version" performed in the sauna in front Moscow, working on Putin ". . . I expected the reaction of the authorities. But it was not.

I was expected for sanctions on Russian thief in the law of Tamaz Somhishvili. But they are not. I do not understand how a Ukrainian can protect the interests of Russian criminal authority in court during the war" , - notes the edition "Glavkom" with reference to Prikhodko. According to him, it is unacceptable to publicly and impunity to offend the leadership of the state, repeating theses of Russian propaganda, especially during the war.