Who blocks the supply of weapons to Ukraine. Kremlin agents began to open in Europe

While all the attention of the media was drawn to the fighting in Ukraine, the Kremlin, politicians, businessmen, pseudo -experts, political parties, journalists and others were significantly intensified in the European space in the European space to discredit the Armed Forces and block the supply of weapons to Ukrainian troops. Germany was one of the countries where the Kremlin was felt the most. Yes, someone can say that Ukrainophobia and Russian lobbying are most clearly manifested in Hungary.

But unlike Hungary, from which Ukraine was expected at all, because it is a subsidized country that lives in hypertrophied populism, there was nothing to help and cannot, there was Germany what to offer. Only she was in no hurry. She was in no hurry because she was inhibited by pro -Russian elements and candid agents of the Kremlin. The beginning of 2023 became no less active in this regard, and even more aggressive.

After all, the Russian military-political leadership was in a state of existential shock, after learning about the start of the process of transfer to Ukraine of the Western model tanks. Most of them were outraged by the fact of the Armed Forces of the LEOPARD Tanks 2. Immediately after it became known to pass tanks to Ukraine, two information campaigns were launched in Russia.

The first-oriented Russian reflection on the fact that the Western sample tanks are destroyed once or twice and in general, a platoon from RPG-7 is sufficient to erase the Leopard 2 or Abrams battalion. The second campaign was focused on Western consumers and was that, for example, in the German information space, a narrative was spreading that Ukraine was "stealing" Germany, "demanding" her expensive weapon for war with Russia, instead of sitting with occupants at the table of peace talks.

Thus, from January 21 to January 22, a poster appeared at the Hacker Airport as a result of the Hacker Airport, calling for not to pass Leopard 2 and stop "looting" the Bundesver. Similar advertising signs appeared in different cities of Germany alone, warming up a negative attitude towards the transfer of weapons and equipment to Ukraine. And the day before there are several very similar in content of articles that undermine faith in helping Ukraine.

The first was the article of the Russian agent in Austria, Frau, which completely and completely lobbied the interests of Russia in Europe, Karin Kneissl. The article was published in the Russian propaganda edition of "Vedomosti" and in it a sales policy, who danced with Putin, a guest of honorary guest at her wedding, when blood was spilled in Ukraine for several years, criticized the event for the support of Ukraine.

The second material was the note in The Economist, where, in fact, a familiar narrative that Ukraine had "ruined" the German army and caused its decline. That is, Ukraine is guilty that Russia has attacked, and Germany cannot help it fully, since many years of pacifist policy led the Bundesver to powerlessness? Now we can observe an information wave that will discredit the help in every possible way, and much more active than before.

This is due to the fact that Russia cannot increase its tank potential with technology, though a little modern and appropriate to the level of modern war. And Ukraine, thanks to Western assistance, can. And German tanks Leopard 2 in this matter in priority. It is for this reason that the information pressure on Germany increases like an avalanche, for which Russia uses well known to us familiar to its agents of influence. But the question . . .