Russia spat on the laws of war. Why a blow to Chernihiv goes beyond military law

I do not quite understand… Do you seriously think that a missile blow to the densely populated center of the regional city is possible to "justify" the exhibition of drones? Remind the definition of the term "war crime"? It is a conscious gross violation of the laws and customs of war.

Collective concept in international law, which combines a group of serious violations of the rules of fighting ("law of war") and norms and principles of international humanitarian law, which is committed intentionally or through rude carelessness.

Among the principles underlying the laws of war, there are 3 main ones: thus, in essence, the Russian military-political and military command, having given an appropriate order and organizing this rocket strike on a civilian object and the center of a densely populated city (even even If there were some Ukrainian "drones"), in fact, the first and third principles of the laws of war (Lat.

Jus in Bello, English of LAW OF WAR) were consciously and intention The "ligitimal" (legitimate) goals (which means the same "exhibition of drones") to the Russians, clearly, is not worth it. For, if you are fighting, despite the rules of international law (part of which are the laws and customs of war), then it is necessary to state so directly . . . "For us military expediency is more important than the life and wanderings of civilians" . . .

in this sense, in this sense, The Russian military-political leadership for some reason is persistently adhering to some kind of dualism . . . When they, intentionally intentionally, or mistaken, affect civilian infrastructure or dwellings, kill and cripple civilians, then immediately declare that they "affected the military object ".

That is, by default, they prove that for them the laws and customs of war (in essence, international law) are not a determining factor in the course of organization and conducting of hostilities . . . But here, the official representatives of the Kremlin, they begin to prove that they "unconditionally But necessarily "comply with the laws and customs of war . . . And which is typical, no contradiction, or" non -intrinsic "they, at the same time, do not see. There are two options here: we sum up . . .

All those who are now actively "caught" on the inappropriateness of organizing and conducting "drones" in Chernihiv, make sense solely within the framework of our own strategy of warfare and the desire to optimize and get rid of our "inner mistakes" .