Optics drones can be a nightmare: what are the disadvantages and what can they cause problems for the Armed Forces

Let's discuss the disadvantages: in general, I believe that the potential of radio control has not yet been used and the Russians have advanced more. They have more manufacturers, they have a much larger frequency range on drones, types of combat units, antennas and repeaters. We went out for us as long as everything was at the garage level. They just started "according to/respectively through MO"- and everything went to the pi . . . di.

The drones are outdated, inappropriate to the modern battlefield, and the desire to play as ineffective rules in Moor than the desire to supply effective drones. We only live because there is Aliexpress and Candy in every brigade. There are many interesting solutions, but they have no one to use and put them on. But let's return to the drones on optics.

What are the advantages of all the disadvantages? How to use drones on optics? I think it is a modern option of a bite that needs to reflect the storms (or support if your assault) in a zone with a very active rebon. They are smaller than the missiles in the cite, fly further, and allow the destruction of targets closed by an obstacle (because they simply recover it). But I am not a very specialist in FPV, maybe even more effective methods of application.

What are the problems for us in the short term? Now on the nose summer, the green will soon rise. After that, it will be difficult to detect targets in the first echelon, and logistics on planting enemy infantry will become much safer for the enemy. During this spring, our command had to re -profile the work of drones, stretching the enemy logistics in 2-3 echelon to reach the first at least with fewer means.

For the most part, this is the task of SBS battalions in infantry coordination, which should be responsible for 1 echelon. But in all directions of battalions the SBS will not be enough. We have not been in strategic thinking for tomorrow, but to finish the SBS, not understanding that the use of drones is a seasonal business, and every season according to the weather and circumstances should be implemented its strategy.

But there is no interaction between the head and the commander on this issue at this time, and what is the point, if the strategy is to knock down the SBS commander, and there we will put our own and will be controlled and Zayabiz, and the military about . . . would - and how many of them were already and all n*x. This is not exactly afraid of this. The Russians have a strategy.

To accumulate landing personnel using light automotive equipment and knock out our positions with drones on optics and radio control, knowing that there is a minimum of infantry. They work tactics and successfully. People in them now go into the army against the background of an economic downturn. Therefore, we are waiting for a new offensive, and the Russians know how and what they will do. We go into this summer outsiders, with the tactics "We will first start us . . .

Awit, and then we will start to overcome the circumstances heroically. " We do not prepare for this offensive in advance, we do not prepare our shield for the parameters of the Russian sword. Unfortunately, it will all have consequences. And drones on optics, even with their disadvantages, we will see a lot this summer, and they can reasonably become the horror of our first echelon. The author expresses a personal opinion that may not coincide with the editorial position.