They stole 100 years ago: China stated that Russia should return Vladivostok - social networks

The Chinese CCG expert Zichen Van noted that the Kremlin's obsession is non -constructive, since current laws, not laws of the 8th century, are in force in the modern world. After a high -profile interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin Commentary Tair Carlson, American actor and producer Robert Wu wrote on social networks that Russia should return China to a huge territory, including Vladivostok.

The comments followed under the post of former Sinhua Information Agency, and now a specialist from the Center for China and Globalization (CCG) of the Vana and Globalization (CCG). According to the analyst, almost half an hour of Putin's historical excursion during his conversation with an American journalist shows that the history of the Kremlin head is not constructive.

Van points out that Putin's speech was reference to the early Middle Ages, on the basis of which he draws certain political conclusions about the belonging of the territories. "The interview reaffirms my theory again: obsession with history usually does not bring objectivity. The fact that the historical affiliation of some place to someone is not of great import ADs live in our time with (present, ed.

Under the post, he reminded that if you follow logic, in this case, the Russian Federation should return Vladivostok. "According to history, Russia must return to us Vladivostok and a vast territory, stolen 100 years ago," the American actor writes. Recall that at the end of February 2023, the Ministry of Natural Resources of China published a map of the world, where Russian cities in border areas with China have Chinese names.

In particular, cities such as Vladivostok, Blagoveshchensk, Khabarovsk, and Sakhalin Island were renamed. In this regard, the rumors have crawled in the information space that Beijing has territorial claims to the Russian Federation, although there were no official statements of the Chinese authorities on this. Russian propagandists have tried to find a senseless explanation for their part.

According to them, the map of the world with Chinese names and territories of the Russian Federation is allegedly needed to "poorly known in China depths of the names of border settlements could be compared with recognizable. " Like, this is due to the linguistic difficulties of the designations of place names in the adjacent territory throughout the border of the PRC. For example, it is easier to call Vladivostok - "haystine", not "Fulaladivositic".