Bunker Reconstructors Club: Why Russian Empires are still not sure whose Crimea

In Russia, they talked about "last evidence" that Crimea is Russian. Political scientist Petro Oleshchuk sees in this part of a large geopolitical game and a manifestation of enormous internal uncertainty of the regime. The Russian Duma made an interesting initiative. They want to cancel the decision to transfer Crimea from the RSFSR to the USSR in 1954. Why did they need it? Who knows. They are constantly shouting about "referendum" and "will.

" So what is not really enough? And after the "final decision" to make "more final"? Final nowhere? And then what to do with other territories they seized and as if they were already annexed? Their "accession" does not require such "additional proof"? Or maybe the Brest peace of 1918 was also going to abolish, after which they first recognized the independence of Ukraine? By the way, this peace was also quite Ukrainian.

In general, this gang of imperial reconstructors clearly feels not enough, because if you feel confidence, then you do not need "additional historical arguments". Historical arguments are always about nothing, because every such "argument" can be presented. No less historical weight. But the club of bunker reconstructors can not calm all. What does this testify? Most likely, everything is like anecdote. They are already starting to bargain, getting on the table with the last arguments.

However, if during the month with the same arguments ("It is necessary to stop the war immediately, to give the land to the aggressor for the sake of preserving life, the war will not produce" etc. ) are the Roman Pope and the "full-time opposition" of the bunker grandfather by name Yavlinsky, it cannot be accidental. It is not accidental that another mention of nuclear weapons and "additional arguments" of Crimea belonging.

Obviously, it is a signal from the empire, which is obviously very difficult that it does not want to give the enthusiastic, will protect it "in all ways", so it is better to give it everything, to say that they have "historical cards". And for the sake of promoting this, they mobilized absolutely all agents of influence, who, not stopping for a moment, shouting about some "special rights" and the like. In fact, of course, they do not need no "ceasefire".

But it is important for them that in the possibility of such cessation they believe in the West and do not start seriously to counteract the "rash". They need to be convinced that the aggressors are enough "piece of Ukraine", and they will bite it - and enough! It is not necessary to be re -armed, it is not necessary to restore military potential. "Tomorrow everything will be over. That's what Francis says about it. " I hope no one will perceive a seriously lying source.