USD
41.24 UAH ▼0.28%
EUR
43.47 UAH ▼2.52%
GBP
52.24 UAH ▼2.55%
PLN
10.02 UAH ▼2.9%
CZK
1.72 UAH ▼2.62%
Putin decided to raise the rates of confrontation with the West in the Baltic Se...

Baltic blockade of Russia. How could Putin be destroyed by Putin's marine fantasies

Putin decided to raise the rates of confrontation with the West in the Baltic Sea. Economist Mikhail Gonchar considers this game meaningless, as Russia is very easy to lock there in its ports. By announcing the unilateral view of the maritime borders in the Baltic, the Putin revisionists forgot about some revelations of "Stalin's product". In 1933, visiting the Gulf and admiring the Arctic ocean expanses, he said, "What is the monastic sea? Bali. What is the Baltic? Plishka. And the cork is not here.

Here . From here, we will take the living, if necessary, and England and America. " Putin seems to have decided to "take the lively" NATO in the Baltic. But the "cork from the bottle" is not in him! Bottle neck - Danish ducts. This cork is in the Danes. And Sweden with Finland is already NATO members. And the Baltica is the NATO Sea and the EU. And through the Baltic there is a greasy flow of Russian oil and petroleum products.

You can also roll this throat for the movement of oil tankers in the name of pure and green today and the future Baltic . . . NATO can do the same in the Baltic, closing the area around the Königsberg Exclusive for a long time . . . And now we closely monitor the actions of the Alliance, especially the United States, where it is known that they practice the "anti -indifferent model of" behavior on Russia.

PS I think that our Lithuanian and Finnish friends would be worth inviting Ukrainians from "Sea Baby" and "Magura", providing the opportunity to base on one of the thousands of islands of the Archipelagal Sea, and we would do with the Baltic Fleet of the Russian Federation the same as with the Black Sea . And the Putinoids would quickly hide for themselves somewhere in Kronstadt or on a Little Prospect . . . The author expresses a personal opinion that may not coincide with the editorial position.