USD
41.8 UAH ▲0.04%
EUR
49.03 UAH ▲0.09%
GBP
56.92 UAH ▼0.62%
PLN
11.54 UAH ▼0.05%
CZK
1.99 UAH ▲0.59%
Even an experienced military expert Konstantin Mashovets is surprised by the sit...

The shame of Russia near Kupyansk. As a unique tank army cannot take a Ukrainian village

Even an experienced military expert Konstantin Mashovets is surprised by the situation near Kupyansk. Russia threw its unique, elite army here - but it cannot break through Ukrainian defense, not echelorated at all . . . In Kupyansk, the enemy continued from the onset of the New Year, its attempts to break through the north in the direction of Lyman First - Sinkivka and Vilshan -Petropavlivka. Obviously, in the near future the enemy will continue his attempts to break into the village.

Petropavlivka and towards the road R-07 Kupyansk-Svatovo in the Novoselivka Stepova region from the northern and northeast direction, as well as most likely to restore attacks in the direction of Kuzemivka-Berestovo and Kuzemivka-Stelmakhivka with the participation of units of the 27th OMSBR and 7 -SMEs from the 11th Army Corps (AK) . . .

The enemy has been attacking the advanced units of the Armed Forces for more than 2 months in Kupyansk direction, but during all this time he could only take control of the forest south of the estuary of the first and make the village. Novoselivske "gray zone". Even then, he succeeded in achieving these "significant" results by stopping active offensive actions in the direction of Borov and regrouping a little to the north of the forces and means that operated in this direction.

In particular, the 27th OMSBR and the 7th SMEs acted in the direction of Borova. Therefore, from all sites and directions where, with the onset of the autumn and winter period, the enemy has moved to active (offensive) actions, it is Kupyansky direction that remains for the enemy the least "productive"-first of all in the sense of the ratio of "loss-result" .

And it looks a little strange, because it is here that the troops (forces) of the most powerful and "escly" army of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation-the 1st "Guards" Tank Army (GV. And still supplemented by the main forces of the 6th All-Military Army (ID). The 1st GV is not just unique and the only one in the Russian Federation, but also probably in the world. Because there is no tank formation in the world.

It consists of two full-fledged tank divisions (4-a "Kantemirivska" and 47-A) from 3, which in general exist in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federal -2-A "Taman" MSD + 27 Separate Rifle Brigade (OMSBR) . . . And here all this "beauty plow", supported by Arta, for a month trying not so much to "vanish the abaron in Oskol" as simply break into the outskirts of the left-bank part 'Yang . . . Agree, it looks like, say, not very heroic and professionally.

Ukrainian units and connections from the composition of the operational-tactical grouping of troops (OTU) "Liman", which oppose all this nozzle, which prevails them both in terms of personnel and the number of basic types and samples , simply, as they say in football, "Declassified" of all these "courtiers" of the Kremlin . . . The Armed Forces did not create "Zaluzhny" lines ", did not arrange a" mine sew "with overwhelming density . . . domination, or even simply, the benefits in the air did not have .

Therefore, the 1-a "Guards" tank and 6-A Army Army of the Russians, by and large, would have to move the distance to Oskol (it ranges in different areas and directions from 18 to 21-22 km) in a matter of hours, in a matter of hours Well, let days. However, no, something "does not get"…. The days pass, then weeks, after all, they "take the Sinkivka".

The capture under the control of the half of the village of Novoselivske is issued to the Russians as "an extraordinary victory of the Russian array. " Well, I do not know, maybe it's really "so thoughtful", and all this is a very calculated plan, but from the outside it all looks like not a very successful act of operational masturbation . . . The author expresses a personal opinion that may not coincide with the editorial position.