Shahhedam's death or cutting money: that stands under the program of use of small aviation against UAVs of Russian Federation

First, they are not very effective. Yes, we all saw a video where they knock down "Shahda", but 98% still give jet fighters. Secondly, the military helicopter has the opportunity to install a Turel with large angles of rotation, and this is quite stable, as for the aircraft, a firing platform.

Therefore, he can fly high over "Shahmed" and shoot him from top to bottom a few hundred meters, well recognizing his contour (Shahed on the side, and on light-motor aviation you can insert a machine gun, first, a small, second-sideways, that is, you need to shoot, and the shahah). Third, these are military pilots that have flying both at night and a crushed navigation, which in connection with their directions, they have a protected navigation and corresponding coordination.

Why not very effective? Because speed. This jet aircraft can accelerate and replace the sector in several hundred kilometers long, quickly find the goal of its radar and work it. Helicopters . . . Well, let's say, until you fly to the desired point, the goal is already x . . . knows where. The DFTG PM will be built of two types of tools. The first is anti -aircraft drones. Well, everything is clear here, except who will be systematically implemented there. And here is the second . . . Karoch. What do we do.

We take civilian pilots and their personal small aviation - and record them in DFTG. UBD (participant of hostilities - F. ) We will give simply in the day of duty. You don't even have to take off. Separate a separate number of duty on Earth - received UBD. Cash support - as on the front. Who will coordinate these planes in the sky? Coordination will organize the heads of these DFTGs. That is, this DFTGECHEY TV simply hang the top on a goat direction, and they will be in place there, as they understand.

Acherenno. But who will teach yesterday's civilian pilots that have not flew at night, but in the afternoon, but at an altitude of several hundred meters in equal routes? Former stock pilots. Types that have a note in a military book with a pilot military specialty, well, this is a powerful reserve officer. What a combat experience of BLD in the standoff of "Shahanedam" is an open question.

But, as I understand, not all friends of military leadership can find a normal place of work, with good money, and here again there is where to apply them. We built the GSC today on the principle "and the point . . . as he understands, but he is a colonel" !!! Thank you. Thank you very much. Kyiv now thanks to this powerful pros twice a week. So here. Interesting facts. Easy -motor aviation is such plants that fly at an average at a speed of 250 km/hour.

Yes, this is now the speed of Shahaneda, which has accelerated and has already ate most of the fuel in the tanks. In order to go to the right azimuth - you need a very good coordination of forces and means, because you do not have the advantage in speed, so that you do not fly there, and there is a shahada, but you do not hear it in the direction (you have the engine in your own), and to see it in a heat. But navigation does not work.

That is, you only have a magnetic azimuth, where the plus minus fly. No benefit in speed. Without radar. In the dark. With DFTGECE coordination. Sounds like a good plan. But there is another thing that has been forgotten. And this is the system "your own/alien". Which stands on fighters. There is no light motor aircraft. And at speeds to distinguish them from "Shahaneda" on the radar will not work.

What will be the coordination between the pilot and the SCR, which will see this target at the radar as Shahd? How will the shooters from the mobile group realize that they are not a "shahad", but a corn, and they will not be mounted on it? And there are conditions where thermal imagers work poorly. Fog, cloudy. That is, even optical to understand where you fly at night when you change the dew point and here is a fog - it is difficult. Sitting without navigation is incredibly difficult.

And even with navigation. All of them remember how the Minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs died? Okai, we have pilots of Kamikadze, they have a lot . . . for life. So different fighter pilots have a catapulting system, we can survive and without it, if something goes wrong. But I have a purely practical question. Do you understand that these planes will only interfere with the finding of goals to those who can really knock out "Shahda"? Well, for example, we form a fighting situation.

There is a coordination center of the same DFTG somewhere, two goals come into the radar zone. The pilot grabs one of them, starts . . . Well, let the "shulika" there, and it takes off, and according to this radar, goes to the target for the shortest trajectory. The radar appears another point (anti -aircraft drone) and is not a convergence with a target, the system knows the height and azimuth of the goal of damage and leads to this azimuth and the height of the anti -aircraft drone.

And the pilot is waiting for the Shahaneda silhouette to capture the target. And here the pilot is approaching - that some strange "Shahd". And the drone goes at maximum speed, the battery is discharged very quickly. And when approaching the target, the pilot understands that it is not "Shahaned", but some "cure". And gives a raw attack.

Finds a new goal, and all, the goal is already going out for the Radar's action, Shahaned has already flew further, and the bars will not have enough to catch up with a new goal. And if he is wrong in poor visibility and captures the target and reinforce the combat part? And the pose . . . What was rain, fog, clouds, Teplak worked poorly in such conditions and he did not see the last purpose? Do you know why chewa put 50-90 kg of BC with Shrapnell? With tens of thousands of striking elements.

Yes, it is for the fight against aviation. It is a specially designated combat part to have the largest and most dense fraction of the fragments. The lesion area is several hundred meters from the epicenter of the explosion. And we have already lost some aircraft. Military aircraft. Not made of plastic and thin dural. What if this explosion affects a light motor aircraft? The top is written - there is no catapulting systems there.

And it is necessary to engage in "Shahaned" in the area of ​​possible damage. What should be done by civilian pilots, which was taught by "stock pilots" under the coordination of DFTG. And you need to be in a very thin part of the silhouette. What could go wrong, of course? My personal opinion. After that, the "project" does not have to tell that we have no money for the defense of peaceful cities. Money is.

There is no competence and a desire to exceed… to competent to the agreement to those who know. This project is a grand plow. With the help of city budgets. Which in these difficult times could be used more efficiently. But so it turns out that when you spend money effectively on defense, there is no place for money and the adaptation of the "stock of craftsmen". Therefore, I would very much like the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine to reveal the names of the persons who pushed it.

And yet, I would like to report every month in this project how much money went and how many "Shahmed" was beaten, from a video of objective control. Well, if someone perish in this pi. . ti - so that not a boy of any with a browning group from a mobile group, they were planted who was the primary source of this circumstance. We have money for the defense of the cities. Just someone else is to someone . . . on the effectiveness of the function. Well nothing.

You have been a function for years and drank the loot in comfortable offices. After a couple of months, I have a great hope of you from these offices with your feet in Linch's court. Because I do not understand how it is possible when we have such difficult times, and we are allocating money for this x . . . nude, taking away resources in the development of anti-aircraft-two-sided crews. And I would very much like this scam to have maximum control. Then to know who to ask.