By Natali Moss
In this regard, I want to express my surprise why we throw the young people forward, but forbid to serve as 60? I have many men with good health with good health, who have serious combat experience or unique engineering knowledge. Voluntarily ask. But I have to refuse them, because such a law. Instead, legislators are offered to mobilize those who do not have knowledge and experience.
Why so? Why don't we use this resource? If someone says that men more than 60 are unable to fight, then it will be a big lie. And moreover, the legislation already has a norm that provides for their service! With the only "but" - if they are already servicemen.
That is, if the serviceman is 60 but has high professional training, experience of practical work in their position, recognized by the military-medical commission suitable for health reasons for military service, then at his request, he may be left in military service beyond the marginal age. But if, for example, it is released in 60, rests the month, and then goes back to the army - no, here, it is no longer possible. Nonsense? Nonsense! Which is too expensive for us.
English
Українська
USA
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Polski
Čeština
Español
Slovensku
