"Russia's disease went too far": The expert told that he was waiting for the Russian Federation after Putin (video)

According to Dr. Historical Sciences Yaroslav Gritsak, the event plays a significant role in the formation of the new Russian Federation. And it is important that Ukraine's opinion is taken into account. Russia does not predict any favorable development scenarios, since within the country a regime that requires radical change through "surgery" was formed, and this does not depend on the actions of Vladimir Putin.

This was reported by Doctor of History Yaroslav Gritsak in a comment on the Media Channel 24. In his opinion, the measure will have a significant impact in this process. According to Yaroslav Gritsak, the Russians have expressed a desire to have a leader like Vladimir Putin and now they have such a leader. He has created a stable regime, and it will take considerable time. "I don't know what will happen to Russia after Putin.

But I think that after his departure, the war will change his character or stop. But on the other hand, I see nothing good for Russia with Putin or without. If Ukraine has a good scenario, The Russian Federation is no, "he said. Internal factors, such as strong regional entities, are required for Russia's disintegration. However, Vladimir Putin weakened such structures. The most likely scenario for the Russian Federation can be driven by chaos, which the event can try to control.

In this context, it is important to take into account the interests of Ukraine. "Russia's disease went too far for Russia to cope. It needs to be treated with surgery. This means that it should change not itself, but under pressure from the outside, such as the event. , - Gritsak added. Recall that ISW analysts have stated that the Armed Forces are learning to fight and actively use new tactics in the Donbass.

The occupiers pay great attention to the counter -battering struggle during the attack on Avdiivka, as well as actively use radio -electronic struggle, thoroughly artillery preparation of the battlefield and demonstrate a clear interaction between command, intelligence and assault groups.