Drones do their job. Why are the strikes on the refinery of Russia effective and should be continued

There is no immediate effect from Ukrainian blows on hostile refineries, Russia has not left without cheap gasoline, the market expert Sergey Kuyun recognizes. But this tactic should be continued - there was no quick victory here, and she does her business. From the very beginning, a little tensed in Politico about Russian refineries and the fact that Rasha remained without gasoline. I would very much like it to be true but it's not.

No 10%increase in oil prices has been observed lately, there is even some decrease in individual bases. It is very easy to keep track of Russian exchanges, although the newspaper is called for some government data. There is no news about the shortage. From the available figures we can talk about reducing the exports of diesel and gasoline (the embargo was introduced before massive blows by our drones).

However, these attacks considered and consider it very effective, since with the consumption of several million dollars the enemy caused direct financial losses for hundreds of millions. I am not talking about the destruction of the myth of the closed Russian sky and the need to stretch protection to new objects. We have many victories. This does not happen. It is very difficult to stop the Refinery drone: production is transferred to other lines, and the equipment will sooner or later be repaired.